PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association0 citations

Interpretation, Interpretive Process, and Artificial Intelligence

View Full Paper
NVNeal Vorus

Key Points

  • The study investigates the capabilities of AI in therapeutic settings and argues for the necessity of human interaction in psychoanalysis.
  • Discussed a clinical vignette illustrating human psychoanalytic interaction
  • Analyzed the empathic responsiveness of large language models
  • Examined factors influencing the development of artificial psychoanalysis.
  • Large language models demonstrate significant levels of empathic responsiveness and human emulation.
  • Despite advancements, therapeutic qualities of human interactions in psychoanalysis are not fully replicable by AI.
  • Emerging efforts to develop AI in psychotherapy are fueled by both hope and ethical concerns.

Abstract

This paper addresses the growing body of evidence that large language models (LLM's) are increasingly capable of emulating and in some ways surpassing humans in their capacity for empathic responsiveness. While this development raises concern (and for some, hope) about the potential for AI therapeutic bots, it is the author's contention that the truly therapeutic aspects of psychoanalytic interaction are only possible with another human. This point is demonstrated through discussion of a brief clinical vignette. The paper concludes with a discussion of factors that appear to be driving the effort to develop artificial psychoanalysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Neal Vorus (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192ea9fab5b468c4417db0https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651261443474
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper