PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Prophylactic peptide vaccine targeting resistance mutations in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer: Primary analysis from the ARCHER trial.

View Full Paper
MCMichael R. ConroyYWYuxuan WangBVBert Vogelstein

Key Points

  • Evaluate safety and immune response of a prophylactic peptide vaccine targeting ALK resistance mutations in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer.
  • Phase 1b clinical trial of ALK-Vac vaccine administered alongside standard TKI therapy.
  • Patients received 8 doses of ALK-Vac, targeting seven ALK resistance mutations.
  • Safety and immune responses measured through adverse events and T cell responses using IFN-γ ELISpot.
  • 71% of evaluable patients showed significant T cell response with a median increase of 11.9-fold.
  • Disease control achieved in 93% of patients, indicating effective management of advanced disease.
  • No serious treatment-related adverse events observed; most were grade 1, including injection site reactions in 93% of patients.

Abstract

8517 Background: Acquired resistance to targeted therapy remains a major challenge in ALK-positive NSCLC and is often mediated by mutations in the ALK kinase domain. Prophylactic immune targeting of common ALK resistance mutations represents a novel strategy to delay or prevent the emergence of ALK inhibitor resistance. Methods: We conducted a first-in-human phase 1b clinical trial of a prophylactic peptide vaccine (ALK-Vac) in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients without progression on standard-of-care tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Patients continued their ALK TKI and received ALK-Vac, consisting of synthetic long peptides targeting seven common ALK resistance mutations (I1171T, I1171N, I1171S, L1196M, G1202R, D1203N, E1210K) plus poly-ICLC adjuvant. ALK-Vac was administered subcutaneously on days 1, 4, 8, 15, and 22 (priming) and weeks 12 and 20 (boost). Primary objectives were safety and vaccine-specific T cell responses assessed by IFN-γ ELISpot. Exploratory objectives included molecular and immune-phenotype dynamics assessed by ultrasensitive cell-free DNA (cfDNA) duplex sequencing and CyTOF mass cytometry. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled and all completed the planned ALK-Vac regimen. Most patients (13/15, 87%) were receiving first-line TKI therapy. Concomitant TKIs included alectinib (7/15, 47%), lorlatinib (5/15, 33%), and brigatinib (3/15, 20%). At enrollment, median TKI duration was 43.7 months (range 4.6-74.2) and 67% of patients had no measurable disease. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were primarily grade 1 (93% of patients); most commonly injection site reactions (93%), fatigue (60%), and flu-like symptoms (40%). No grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were observed. T cell responses (≥2-fold increase in SFU) were detected in 71% (10/14) of evaluable patients, with a median 11.9-fold increase. Responses were observed to G1202R, L1196M, and D1203N (each 10/14, 71%), E1210K (9/14, 64%), and I1171N/S/T (each 7/14, 50%). With a median follow-up of 11.5 months, the disease control rate was 93% (14/15). One patient who achieved robust immune response against multiple resistance mutations developed oligoprogression on alectinib 8.5 months after starting ALK-Vac; molecular profiling of this lesion identified an emergent KRAS G12D mutation without detectable ALK resistance mutation. Conclusions: ALK-Vac was well-tolerated and induced vaccine-specific T cell responses in a minimal residual disease setting, demonstrating feasibility of prophylactic targeting of ALK resistance mutations as an adjunct to TKI therapy and supporting a broader immune-interception framework potentially applicable to other oncogene-driven NSCLC. Comprehensive cfDNA and immune-phenotyping analyses will be reported. Clinical trial information: NCT05950139 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Conroy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192f1bfab5b468c441867ehttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.8517
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper