PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

HRS-8080, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (aBC) with ESR1 mutations ( ESR1 m): Results from a first-in-human phase 1 trial.

View Full Paper
ZJZ F JiangTLT LuoHLHaifeng Liu

Key Points

  • This trial aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of HRS-8080 in patients with advanced breast cancer harboring ESR1 mutations.
  • Multi-part, open-label, single-arm phase 1 trial with 40 patients treated with HRS-8080.
  • Patients included those with locally advanced/metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy and chemotherapy.
  • Doses of HRS-8080 ranged from 50 to 900 mg daily, with a focus on safety and dose-response relationship.
  • Overall, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 20.0% (8/40) of patients.
  • At the expansion doses, the objective response rate was 34.4% (11/32; 95% CI 18.6–53.2), with a disease control rate of 75.0% (24/32; 95% CI 56.6–88.5).
  • The median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% CI 3.6–11.1).

Abstract

1069 Background: HRS-8080 is a novel, potent oral SERD that binds ER with high affinity. We conducted a multi-part, first-in-human phase 1 trial of HRS-8080 in ER+/HER2- aBC, and here report findings in the ESR1 m subset from the dose-escalation/expansion parts for HRS-8080 monotherapy. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase 1 study enrolled patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic ER+/HER2- BC previously treated with ≥1 line of endocrine therapy (ET) and ≤2 lines of chemotherapy for aBC; ESR1 m status was centrally assessed by ctDNA. In Part A (i3+3 design), pts received HRS-8080 QD (50, 150, 300, 600, or 900 mg) or BID (300 mg); in Part B, 300 mg BID/600 mg QD were selected for expansion. Safety was a primary objective. Results: 40 pts with ESR1 m were treated (≥2 prior lines of therapy, 70.0%; ≥2 prior lines of ET for aBC, 42.5%; chemotherapy for aBC, 57.5%), including 32 at expansion doses. Overall, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 8 (20.0%) of 40 pts; the most common were decreased lymphocyte count and decreased neutrophil count (2 5.0% pts each). TRAEs led to dose reduction in 1 (2.5%) pt. There were no treatment-related deaths. Efficacy in the ESR1 m subset is shown in Table 1. At expansion doses of 300 mg BID/600 mg QD, the confirmed objective response rate was 34.4% (11/32; 95% CI 18.6–53.2) and the disease control rate was 75.0% (24/32; 95% CI 56.6–88.5). Median duration of response was 11.1 mo (95% CI 6.5–not reached), with over half of responses remained ongoing. As of data cutoff, 21 (65.6%) pts had disease progression or died; median progression-free survival was 7.2 mo (95% CI 3.6–11.1). Conclusions: HRS-8080 demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile and encouraging antitumor activity in ESR1m ER+/HER2− aBC, supporting ongoing clinical development both as monotherapy and in combination regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT05189717 . Key baseline characteristics and efficacy in ESR1 m subset. * 50mg QD~300mg QD (n=6) 300mg BID+600mg QD (n=32) 900mg QD(n=2) All patients(n=40) ≥2 prior lines of therapy, n (%) 5 (83.3) 21 (65.6) 2 (100.0) 28 (70.0) ≥2 prior lines of ET for aBC, n (%) 3 (50.0) 13 (40.6) 1 (50.0) 17 (42.5) Chemotherapy for aBC, n (%) 5 (83.3) 16 (50.0) 2 (100.0) 23 (57.5) Confirmed ORR, %(n/N; 95% CI) 0 34.4(11/32; 18.6–53.2) 0 27.5(11/40; 14.6–43.9) Median DoR, mo (95% CI) – 11.1 (6.5–NR) – 11.1 (6.5–NR) Median PFS, mo (95% CI) 2.2 (1.7–5.5) 7.2 (3.6–11.1) NR (9.2–NR) 7.2 (3.6–10.9) Median follow-up, mo (range) 3.0 (0.3–24.6) 6.7 (1.5–34.3) 21.3 (10.4–32.2) 6.6 (0.3–34.3) Data cutoff, Dec. 18, 2025. * Patients relapsed after 24 months if receiving adjuvant ET, and had disease progression ≥6 months of the first-line ET in the advanced setting. aBC, advanced breast cancer; DoR, duration of response; ET, endocrine therapy; NR, not reached; ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression-free survival.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192f1bfab5b468c4418684https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.1069
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Phase 1/2 study of H3B-6545 in women with locally advanced/metastatic estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2H3B-6545 in women with locally advanced/metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2 negative (–) breast cancer (BC).2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3HRS-5041, an androgen receptor degrader, in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A phase 1, multicenter, first-in-human study.2026
  4. 4HRS-1167 (M9466), a PARP1 inhibitor, combined with abiraterone acetate and prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A phase 1b/2 study.2026
  5. 5Abstract PS1-08-26: A phase 1/2, multi-part, open-label study of FWD1802, a novel oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in patients with ER+/ HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC)2026