PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Capivasertib plus fulvestrant in Chinese patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer: Interim analysis of CAPItrue.

View Full Paper
PYP YuanZCZhanhong ChenLCLi Cai

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capivasertib plus fulvestrant in Chinese patients with advanced breast cancer after prior treatment failure.
  • Conducted an interim analysis in an ongoing phase IIIb study (CAPItrue) of capivasertib plus fulvestrant in 195 Chinese patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer.
  • All patients received oral capivasertib (400 mg BID, 4 days on, 3 days off) and intramuscular fulvestrant after progression on endocrine therapy with or without cdk4/6 inhibitors.
  • Evaluated baseline characteristics, biomarker profiles, and preliminary objective response rate (ORR) after at least 4 months of follow-up.
  • Overall ORR was 35.6% (37/104), with a 43.1% ORR (25/58) in the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered group.
  • At a median follow-up of 4.1 months, 92.8% of patients experienced at least one adverse event; 34.9% had grade ≥3 adverse events.
  • No new safety signals were identified, with a similar safety profile in both overall and altered groups.

Abstract

1088 Background: After disease progression on cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) plus endocrine therapy (ET), patients (pts) with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) face limited treatment options and poor prognosis, particularly those with PI3K/AKT pathway tumor alterations, which are major drivers of disease progression and treatment resistance mediated centrally by AKT. Targeting the PI3K/AKT pathway represents a mechanism-driven precision strategy to overcome CDK4/6i/ET resistance, with potential to maximize ET benefit and delay subsequent chemotherapy. In the phase III CAPItello-291 trial, capivasertib (CAPI) plus fulvestrant (FUL) improved progression free survival (7.3 vs 3.1 months, HR 0.50) versus placebo plus FUL in pts with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN -altered tumors. CAPItrue (NCT06635447) is an ongoing phase IIIb study of CAPI plus FUL in Chinese pts with HR+/HER2- ABC progressing on ET, with a focus on PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered disease, aiming to inform precision 2 nd line treatment following CDK4/6i progression. Methods: CAPItrue enrolled Chinese pts with HR+/HER2- ABC progressing on ET±CDK4/6i. All pts received oral CAPI (400 mg BID, 4 days on, 3 days off) and intramuscular FUL. This pre-specified interim analysis was performed in the cohort (C1) without prior FUL (conducted after the last C1 pt received ≥1 dose of study treatment). Baseline characteristics, biomarker profiles, preliminary efficacy (interim objective response rate ORR was evaluated in pts with ≥4 months of follow-up) and safety were summarized. Results: By Aug 20, 2025, 195 pts were enrolled in C1 and received study treatment. PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations were detected in 115 (59.0%) pts (altered group). The median age was 55.0 yrs; 64.1% were post-menopausal. Prior therapy for ABC included: 75.4%/8.7% 1/2 prior lines of ET; 65.1% CDK4/6i, 17.9% chemotherapy. The altered group showed similar characteristics. In patients with ≥4 months of follow-up, ORR was 35.6% overall (37/104, 1 complete and 36 partial responses PR) and 43.1% in the altered group (25/58, 25 PR). Overall, at a median follow-up of 4.1 months,92.8% had ≥1 adverse event (AE); 88.7% had AEs possibly related to CAPI; and 34.9%/11.8% had grade ≥3/serious AEs (SAE). A similar safety profile was seen in the altered group (any AE: 92.2%, grade ≥3 AE: 30.4%, SAE: 11.3%). No new safety signal was observed. Conclusions: In Chinese pts with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN -altered HR+/HER2- ABC previously treated with ET±CDK4/6i, CAPI plus FUL showed encouraging preliminary efficacy and safety. Follow-up is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT06635447 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192f1bfab5b468c44186c3https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.1088
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract PS12-09: Capivasertib plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor and fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: updated Phase 1b analysis from CAPItello-2922024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Abstract PS17-03: Capivasertib and fulvestrant for patients with aromatase inhibitor-resistant HR positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: exploratory analysis of PFS by AKT pathway gene from the Phase 3 CAPItello-291 trial2024 · 5 citations
  3. 3Abstract PO2-19-10: CAPItello-292 Phase 3: An open-label, randomized study of capivasertib, fulvestrant, and investigator’s choice of CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib or ribociclib) in HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4Abstract RF7-05: Capivasertib plus fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC): exploratory ctDNA analyses from the Phase 3 CAPItello-291 trial2026 · 5 citations
  5. 5Abstract PS5-07-03: Capitrue, capicorn, and capitana: three phase iiib studies to evaluate the use of capivasertib in combination with fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer who have relapsed/progressed on endocrine therapy and cdk4/6 inhibitors reflecting real-world clinical practice in china, germany, belgium, portugal and spain2026