PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Solar RRL0 citations

2% Efficient Kesterite Solar Cells From Dimethyl Sulfoxide Solution via Li + Cd Co‐Doping

View Full Paper
SXShiliang XiaoCXChunxu XiangYLYize Li

Key Points

  • This research aims to enhance the efficiency of kesterite solar cells through Li and Cd co-doping in a dimethyl sulfoxide solution.
  • Kesterite solar cells were fabricated from dimethyl sulfoxide solution with Li + and Cd 2+ co-doping.
  • Device performance was evaluated by analyzing crystallinity and carrier concentration.
  • Enhancements to interface properties were measured at the CZTSSe/CdS heterojunction.
  • Achieved a power conversion efficiency of 14.2% for the optimized solar cell.
  • Co-doping significantly improved crystallinity and reduced defect density.
  • Enhanced hole carrier concentration and reduced carrier recombination at the interface.

Abstract

Kesterite Cu 2 ZnSn (S,Se) 4 (CZTSSe) solar cells, as an emerging class of inorganic photovoltaics, offer promising application prospects owing to their earth‐abundant and environmentally benign constituent elements, as well as a high theoretical power conversion efficiency. However, the relatively low majority carrier concentration, detrimental band tailing induced by bulk Cu–Zn disorder defects, and severe interface recombination limit further improvement in device efficiency. In a dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution system, extrinsic cation doping with Li + and Cd 2+ was introduced to optimize both bulk and interfacial properties of the CZTSSe absorber. The results show that the co‐incorporation of Li and Cd into the absorber significantly improves its crystallinity, reduces defect density, and suppresses band tailing states, while simultaneously enhancing the hole carrier concentration of CZTSSe. Furthermore, Li + Cd co‐doping results in more favorable conduction band offset (CBO) at CZTSSe/CdS heterojunction interface compared to the control group, which effectively reduces carrier recombination and enhances carrier collection efficiency, achieving a power conversion efficiency of 14.2% for the champion device.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192f1bfab5b468c44186fahttps://doi.org/10.1002/solr.70386
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Defect‐Competitive Equilibrium Driven 13.83% Efficiency Breakthrough in DMF‐Based CZTSSe Solar Cells2025 · 20 citations
  2. 2A “One‐Stone‐Three‐Birds” Strategy: Multifunctional Y‐Doping in CdS Buffer Layer Enables 15.19% Efficient Kesterite Solar Cells2026 · 1 citations
  3. 310.6% Efficient Solution-Processed Cu2ZnSnS4 Solar Cells via Cation Substitutions and Li Doping2026 · 2 citations
  4. 4Flexible CZTSSe Thin-Film Solar Cells with Over 14% Certified Efficiency Enabled by Lithium Doping2026 · 4 citations
  5. 5An Analytical Review of Strategies for Enhancing the Efficiency of Cu <sub>2</sub> ZnSn(S <i> <sub>x</sub> </i> , Se <sub> 1‐ <i>x</i> </sub> ) <sub>4</sub> Thin‐Film Solar Cells2026