PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Revisiting the Relationship Between Market Multiples and Portfolio Returns: A Case Study of Pakistan

View Full Paper
CRContemporary Journal of Social Science Review

Key Points

  • This analysis explores how macroeconomic shocks affect the relationship between market multiples and portfolio returns in the Pakistani equity market.
  • Data collected through simple random sampling of 118 non-financial firms listed at the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX).
  • Analysis focuses on market multiples including P/B, P/E, P/S, P/CF, EV/EBITDA, and EPS from 2017 to 2023.
  • Ten firms defaulted during the period, showcasing distress in the market.
  • P/CF and EPS are identified as robust predictors of holding period returns (HPR) with positive significance over the years.
  • P/E and P/B exhibit negative relationships with portfolio returns.
  • High dispersion and negative values were observed amid market distress.

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit the relationship between market multiples and portfolio returns in the case of the Pakistani equity market throughout the crisis period of 2017 to 2023, marked by currency devaluation (over 50% decline in Pakistani rupee), inflation at 38%, political instability, and a 30-billion-dollar annual increase in external debt burdens. Despite extensive global research on market multiples such as price to book ratio (P/B), price to earnings ratio (P/E), price to sales ratio (P/S), price to cash flow (P/CF), enterprise multiple (EV/EBITDA), and earnings per share (EPS), very little research has been done in case of Pakistan, motivating this analysis of how macroeconomic shocks disrupt traditional valuation of dynamics? The data has been collected through simple random sampling of 118 non-financial firms (10 of which defaulted during the period) listed at the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) to provide an overall nationwide view of the situation. The results showed high dispersion and negative values amid distress. Findings show that P/CF and EPS are robust predictors of holding period returns (HPR), with positive significance across years, whereas P/E and P/B show negative relationships. This addresses research gaps in emerging market crises and offers adaptive insights for investors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192f1bfab5b468c4418807https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20411702
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper