PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1970Circulation Research73 citationsOpen Access

Reflex Vascular Responses to Stimulation of Chemoreceptors with Nicotine and Cyanide

View Full Paper
MCManuel G. CalveloFAFrançois M. AbboudDBDENNIS R. BOLLARD

Key Points

  • This research aims to characterize vascular responses activated by chemoreceptor stimulation using nicotine and cyanide.
  • Chemicals nicotine and cyanide were administered to anesthetized, artificially ventilated dogs.

Structured PICO

Does stimulation of aortic and carotid chemoreceptors with nicotine and cyanide alter vascular resistance in different vascular beds in dogs?

P
Population
Anesthetized and artificially ventilated dogs
I
Intervention
Stimulation of aortic and carotid chemoreceptors with nicotine and cyanide
O
Outcome
Changes in total vascular resistance (reflected by perfusion pressure) and venous resistance (reflected by small vein pressure) in the isolated gracilis muscle and hindpawsurrogate

Stimulation of chemoreceptors with nicotine and cyanide elicits distinct, bed-specific sympathetic vascular responses in dogs, including both constriction and active dilatation.

Abstract

Experiments were done to characterize the vascular responses to stimulation of aortic and carotid chemoreceptors and to identify the efferent components of the sympathetic system which are activated in different vascular beds. The chemoreceptors were stimulated with nicotine and cyanide in anesthetized and artificially ventilated dogs. The gracilis muscle and hindpaw were isolated and perfused with blood at constant flow. Changes in perfusion pressure reflected changes in total vascular resistance, and changes in small vein pressure reflected changes in venous resistance. The results indicate that stimulation of carotid and aortic chemoreceptors activates selectively efferent adrenergic constrictor fibers supplying prevenous resistance vessels in the gracilis muscle and venous resistance vessels in the paw. In contrast, there was a dilatation of prevenous resistance vessels in the paw caused by activation of efferent sympathetic dilator fibers and not by withdrawal of sympathetic constrictor tone. The dilatation was not mediated through the release of acetylcholine, histamine, or bradykinin nor through beta receptors. Bilateral denervation of the carotid sinus and body and bilateral vagotomy abolished the reflex responses caused by injections of the chemicals. These responses were not the result of activation of baroreceptors since they were not reproduced during electrical stimulation of the carotid sinus nerve.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Calvelo et al. (1970) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a196b4dac919e0a48890eb2https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.27.2.259
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper