PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1983Legislative Studies Quarterly126 citations

Party, Constituency, and Roll-Call Voting in the U. S. Senate

View Full Paper
CBCharles S. BullockDBDavid Brady

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A longitudinal analysis of a 30-year period shows that the more heterogeneous a state's population, the more likely it is to have simultaneously a Democratic and a Republican senator. A path analysis linking constituency, competitiveness, party, and roll-call variables is tested on data from the 1970 census and the 93rd Congress. Geographic heterogeneity is related to diversity in the reelection constituencies of senators representing the same state. Reelection constituency is, in turn, related to party control of a state's Senate seats. While reelection constituency has a greater direct effect than geographic constituency on roll-call behavior, party has the largest direct effect. Constituency characteristics have a larger effect than party when direct and indirect effects are combined.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bullock et al. (1983) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1990229289b0a87eea600ahttps://doi.org/10.2307/439469
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper