PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 15, 2015Patient Education and Counseling90 citationsOpen Access

Disparities in perceived patient–provider communication quality in the United States: Trends and correlates

View Full Paper
KSKiara K. SpoonerJSJason L. SalemiHSHamisu M. Salihu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe disparities and temporal trends in the level of perceived patient-provider communication quality (PPPCQ) in the United States, and to identify sociodemographic and health-related factors associated with elements of PPPCQ. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using nationally-representative data from the 2011-2013 iterations of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Descriptive statistics, multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations. RESULTS: PPPCQ scores, the composite measure of patients' ratings of communication quality, were positive overall (82.8; 95% CI: 82.1-83.5). However, less than half (42-46%) of respondents perceived that providers always addressed their feelings, spent enough time with them, or helped with feelings of uncertainty about their health. Older adults and those with a regular provider consistently had higher PPPCQ scores, while those with poorer perceived general health were consistently less likely to have positive perceptions of their providers' communication behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in PPPCQ can be attributed to patients' age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, employment status, income, healthcare access and general health. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These findings may inform educational and policy efforts which aim to improve patient-provider communication, enhance the quality of care, and reduce health disparities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Spooner et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a19bbcc60e90a7f5fea9a62https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An Introduction to Multiple Imputation of Complex Sample Data using SAS® v9.22010 · 41 citations
  2. 2Using the Internet to Help With Diet, Weight, and Physical Activity: Results From the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)2013 · 95 citations
  3. 3Patient-Centered Communication1999 · 50 citations
  4. 4Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), 20032009 · 13 citations
  5. 5Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls2009 · 7,346 citations