PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1991Circulation Research160 citationsOpen Access

Microvascular pressures and resistances in the left ventricular subepicardium and subendocardium.

View Full Paper
WCWilliam M. Chilian

Structured PICO

P
Population
Isolated blood- and physiological saline-perfused porcine hearts
I
Intervention
Measurement of microvascular pressures in the subendocardial microcirculation during cardiac arrest and maximal vasodilation
C
Comparator
Measurement in the subepicardial microcirculation
O
Outcome
Microvascular pressures (arteriolar and venular) and relative distribution of resistancessurrogate

The distribution of microvascular resistances and pressures differs significantly between the subepicardial and subendocardial microcirculations during maximal vasodilation, which may relate to unequal vulnerability to ischemia.

Abstract

These experiments tested the hypothesis that differences in the distribution of subepicardial and subendocardial microvascular resistances may alter the transmural distributions of microvascular pressures. Isolated blood- and physiological saline-perfused porcine hearts were surgically incised to enable exposure of the subendocardial and subepicardial microcirculations. Microvascular pressures were measured during cardiac arrest and maximal vasodilation at various perfusion pressures to formulate relations between perfusion pressure and microvascular pressure in the different subendocardial (both free wall and papillary muscle) and subepicardial segments. Measurements of arteriolar and venular pressures in both myocardial regions were performed in comparably sized vessels (80-120 microns in diameter). At a coronary perfusion pressure of 100 mm Hg, subendocardial arteriolar and venular pressures were 60 +/- 4 and 33 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively. In contrast, at the same coronary perfusion pressure, arteriolar and venular pressures in the subepicardial microcirculation averaged 80 +/- 6 and 22 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively (p less than 0.05 versus subendocardium). At all levels of coronary perfusion pressure, arteriolar pressures were significantly lower in the subendocardium than in the subepicardium (p less than 0.05). Venular pressures were also higher in the subendocardial microcirculation than in the subepicardial microcirculation at all but the lowest perfusion pressure (p less than 0.05). The relative distribution of resistances in arteries, microvessels, and veins was also different between the subepicardium and subendocardium. Specifically, in the subendocardium, arterial and venous resistances were higher, percentage-wise, but microvascular resistance was proportionately lower than that in the subepicardium (p less than 0.05). From these data, it is concluded that the distribution of microvascular resistances and pressures is different during maximal vasodilation in the subepicardial and subendocardial microcirculations of the left ventricle. It is also speculated that differences in autoregulatory capacity and vulnerability to ischemia may be partially related to unequal distribution of microvascular resistances across the wall of the left ventricle.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

William M. Chilian (1991) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a2ab39dd58c84b95b5eb8https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.69.3.561
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper