PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1992Journal of Clinical Investigation19 citationsOpen Access

Exacerbation of ischemic dysfunction by angiotensin II in red cell-perfused rabbit hearts. Effects on coronary flow, contractility, and high-energy phosphate metabolism.

TMTakatoshi MochizukiFEFranz R. EberliCACarl S. Apstein

Structured PICO

Does angiotensin II exacerbate ischemic dysfunction in red cell-perfused rabbit hearts during low-flow ischemia and reperfusion?

P
Population
Red cell-perfused isovolumic rabbit hearts
I
Intervention
Angiotensin II (10(-8) M) administered during 30 minutes of low-flow ischemia and 30 minutes of reperfusion
C
Comparator
No-drug group, and a separate no-drug group with matched progressive reduction in coronary flow during ischemia
O
Outcome
Left ventricular developed pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), coronary flow, myocardial ATP levels, and lactate productionsurrogate

In a rabbit heart model, angiotensin II exerted a direct adverse effect on left ventricular diastolic relaxation during low-flow ischemia and recovery, independent of its effects on coronary flow.

Abstract

We studied the effects of angiotensin II during low-flow ischemia and reperfusion using red cell-perfused isovolumic rabbit hearts. Under baseline conditions where coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) was 100 mm Hg and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was set at 10 mm Hg, 10(-8) M angiotensin II caused a mild increase in LV developed pressure (+12%) and decrease in coronary flow (-8%). Low-flow ischemia was imposed by reducing CPP to 15 mm Hg for 30 min followed by 30 min of reperfusion. During ischemia, the angiotensin II group showed a gradual further reduction in coronary flow in association with a greater depression of LV developed pressure and increase in LVEDP relative to the no-drug group. To separate the effect of angiotensin II on coronary flow from a direct myocardial effect, the angiotensin II group was compared with an additional no-drug group with a matched progressive reduction in coronary flow during ischemia. In these groups, the ischemic depression of LV developed pressure, myocardial ATP levels, and lactate production were similar. However, the ischemic rise in LVEDP was greater (42.0 +/- 5.4 vs. 19.9 +/- 1.3 mm Hg, P less than 0.01) and recovery was incomplete in the angiotensin II group. These observations suggest that angiotensin II exerts a direct adverse effect on LV diastolic relaxation during low-flow ischemia and recovery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mochizuki et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a2f029b2d28adb7b4fa2ehttps://doi.org/10.1172/jci115611
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper