PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 10, 2020Clinical Research in Cardiology27 citationsOpen Access

Automatic positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

HFHenrik FoxTBThomas BitterOSOdile Sauzet

Structured PICO

Does automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) improve cardiopulmonary exercise capacity (peak VO2) in patients with stable HFrEF and moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea?

P
Population
76 adults with chronic, stable heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (NYHA class ≥ II, LVEF ≤ 45%) and moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Mean age 66.1 years, 81.6% male, single-center (Germany).
I
Intervention
Automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) therapy (AutoSet™, ResMed) applied nightly for 6 months. Average device use was 6.0 ± 1.6 hours per night.
C
Comparator
Nasal strips (Breathe Right®; proven placebo therapy) for 6 months.
O
Outcome
Changes in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2), percent-predicted peak VO2, and oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (VO2-AT) from baseline to 6 months.surrogate

In patients with HFrEF and moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea, 6 months of APAP therapy significantly improved percent-predicted peak VO2, left ventricular ejection fraction, and quality of life compared to control.

Limitations

  • Small sample size (pilot study)
  • Per-protocol analysis (58 of 76 randomized patients completed the study)
  • Small differences in baseline age and weight between groups that may influence the study

Abstract

Abstract Background Moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent in heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), and is associated with worsening cardiac function and increased mortality. Objectives The automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) trial tested the impact of APAP treatment on changes for the pre-specified endpoints: changes in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO 2 ), percent-predicted peak VO 2 and oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (VO 2 -AT). Methods This randomized, controlled pilot study included patients with chronic, stable HFrEF who had moderate-to-severe OSA. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either APAP (AutoSet™, ResMed) or nasal strips (control) for 6 months. Results 76 patients have been randomized and 58 had complete data for final analysis. There was a statistically significant change in the APAP intervention arm for the primary endpoint percent-predicted peak VO 2 in comparison to control (67 ± 17 to 73 ± 19%; p = 0.01). Additional primary endpoints peak VO 2 and VO 2 -AT showed a trend in increase in the APAP group. Moreover, there were significant improvements within the APAP group for hypoxemia, left ventricular function and quality of life from baseline to 6 months, but not within the control group ( p = 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively). Conclusion APAP intervention was shown to significantly improve outcome compared to control group, represented in percent-predicted peak VO 2 , an established surrogate marker for cardiovascular prognosis in HFrEF. APAP has additional beneficial effects on hypoxemia, cardiac function and quality of life.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fox et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a518bb10be780d7c3ffe0https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01701-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper