PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Inorganic Chemistry0 citationsOpen Access

An Evaluation of Cage Amine Sarcophagine Ligands for the Synthesis of Cobalt Radiopharmaceuticals

View Full Paper
HHHailey HousonUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamSRStacey E. RuddBiotechnology InstituteSFSolana FernandezUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham

Key Points

  • This work aims to assess the potential of a sarcophagine derivative as a ligand for cobalt-55 radiopharmaceuticals.
  • Synthesized and characterized cobalt(III) complexes with MeCOSar and SarTATE ligands.
  • Radiolabeled MeCOSar and SarTATE with cobalt-55 and copper-64 for biodistribution studies.
  • Evaluated biodistribution and tumor uptake in both non tumor-bearing and AR42J tumor-bearing mice.
  • [55Co][CoIII(SarTATE)] shows lower tumor uptake and higher liver uptake compared to [64Cu][CuII(SarTATE)].
  • Radiolabeling with cobalt-55 requires higher temperatures than copper-64.
  • Tumor uptake of [55Co][CoIII(SarTATE)] in AR42J mice was directly compared to that of the copper-64 complex.

Abstract

Positron-emitting cobalt-55 (t1/2 = 17.53 h, β+ = 77%, Eγ = 931.1 keV, Iγ = 75%) has the potential to be used for PET imaging and Auger electron-emitting cobalt-58m (t1/2 = 9.10 h, IC= 100%) has the potential to be used in targeted radionuclide therapy. Sarcophagines are a family of macrobicyclic cage amine ligands that form stable complexes with cobalt(III). This work investigates the potential of a derivative of sarcophagine with a pendent carboxylic acid functional group, 5-(8-methyl-3,6,10,13,16,19-hexaaza-bicyclo6.6.6icosan-1-ylamino)-5-oxopentanoic acid (known as MeCOSar), to serve as a ligand for cobalt-55. The cobalt(III) complex, CoIII(MeCOSar)3+, was synthesized and characterized as well as a complex where the MeCOSar ligand is conjugated to tumor-targeting peptide Tyr3-ocreotate, CoIII(SarTATE)3+. The MeCOSar and SarTATE ligands were radiolabeled with cobalt-55 to give 55CoCoIII(MeCOSar)n+ and 55CoCoIII(SarTATE) respectively and their biodistribution was evaluated in non tumor-bearing mice. The tumor uptake of 55CoCoIII(SarTATE) was then further evaluated in AR42J tumor-bearing mice and compared to the copper-64 complex, 64CuCuII(SarTATE). Radiolabeling SarTATE with cobalt-55 requires higher temperatures when compared to copper-64, and 55CoCoIII(SarTATE) has lower tumor uptake and higher liver uptake in tumor-bearing mice when compared to 64CuCuII(SarTATE).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Houson et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a7e2f0307b7850943100ahttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6c01482
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The tumour sink effect on the biodistribution of 68Ga-DOTA-octreotate: implications for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy2011 · 155 citations
  2. 2Metal ion encapsulation: cobalt cages derived from polyamines, formaldehyde, and nitromethane1984 · 210 citations
  3. 3Opportunities in somatostatin research: biological, chemical and therapeutic aspects2003 · 554 citations
  4. 4Mechanistic Studies of Metal Aqua Ions: A Semi‐Historical Perspective2005 · 103 citations
  5. 5[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC: The First FDA-Approved 68Ga-Radiopharmaceutical for PET Imaging2020 · 181 citations