PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2025Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports25 citationsOpen Access

The Effect of EEG Neurofeedback Training on Sport Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

View Full Paper
CYChien‐Lin YuNational Taiwan Normal UniversityMCMing‐Yang ChengNational Taiwan University of SportXAXin AnSun Yat-sen University

Structured PICO

Does EEG neurofeedback training improve sport motor tasks?

P
Population
25 randomized controlled trials (21 eligible for meta-analysis) evaluating the effect of EEG neurofeedback on motor performance
I
Intervention
EEG neurofeedback training (NFT)
C
Comparator
Control groups in the included randomized controlled trials
O
Outcome
Sport motor tasks / motor performance

EEG neurofeedback training demonstrates a moderate positive impact on sport motor tasks, with larger effect sizes observed in studies employing higher methodological quality.

Limitations

  • Methodological gaps in some included studies, such as reporting on participant strategies, data processing methods, and the relationship between regulation success and behavioral outcomes

Abstract

Neurofeedback training (NFT) has emerged as a promising technique for enhancing sports performance by enabling individuals to self-regulate their neural activity. However, only 53% of the 13 included studies, all of which published before 2021, in the latest meta-analyses of NFT and motor performance focused on motor performance outcomes. Due to the rapid development of neurofeedback, 8 high-quality articles were published in 2023-2024 alone. Therefore, there is a need for a new meta-analysis to update the impact of NFT on sports performance. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we have not only reassessed the knowledge of the effect of EEG neurofeedback in motor performance but have also incorporated a standardized methodology, known as the CRED-nf checklist (Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioral neurofeedback studies), for methodological evaluation of previous EEG neurofeedback studies. The study protocol was pre-registered, and a systematic search was conducted across major databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. A total of 25 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, with 21 studies eligible for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed a moderate positive effect of NFT on sport motor tasks, with a Hedges's g of 0.78 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.49-1.07. Importantly, subgroup analyses showed that studies with higher methodological quality scores, as assessed by the CRED-nf checklist, had significantly larger effect sizes (Hedges's g = 1.07) compared to lower than median studies (Hedges's g = 0.49). This finding highlights the importance of addressing key methodological gaps, such as reporting on participant strategies, data processing methods, and the relationship between regulation success and behavioral outcomes. In conclusion, NFT showcases a moderate positive impact on sport motor task, particularly when high-quality methodologies are employed, as assessed by the CRED-nf checklist, underscoring the importance of rigorous study designs in future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1aa3cc739ab56a9085c4e9https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70055
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The influence of electrocortical biofeedback on performance in pre-elite archers1991 · 188 citations
  2. 2Neurofeedback course applying of high skilled gymnasts in competitive period2012 · 14 citations
  3. 3Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions2019 · 14,880 citations
  4. 4Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test1997 · 57,610 citations
  5. 5Neurofeedback Research in Sport2018 · 4 citations