PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 14, 2021Applied Energy88 citationsOpen Access

Financing carbon lock-in in developing countries: Bilateral financing for power generation technologies from China, Japan, and the United States

View Full Paper
XCXu ChenZLZhongshu LiKGKevin P. Gallagher

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Power sector decarbonization requires a fundamental redirection of global finance from fossil fuel infrastructure towards low carbon technologies. Bilateral finance plays an important role in the global energy transition to non-fossil energy, but an understanding of its impact is limited. Here, for the first time, we compare the influence of overseas finance from the three largest economies – United States, China, and Japan – on power generation development beyond their borders and evaluate the associated long-term CO2 emissions. We construct a new dataset of Japanese and U.S. overseas power generation finance between 2000 and 2018 by analyzing their national development finance institutions’ press releases and annual reports and tracking their foreign direct investment at the power plant level. Synthesizing this new data with previously developed datasets for China, we find that the three countries’ overseas financing concentrated in fossil fuel power technologies over the studied period. Financing commitments from China, Japan, and the United States facilitated 101 GW, 95 GW, and 47 GW overseas power capacity additions, respectively. The majority of facilitated capacity additions are fossil fuel plants (64% for China, 87% for Japan, and 66% for the United States). Each of the countries’ contributions to non-hydro renewable generation was less than 15% of their facilitated capacity additions. Together, we estimate that overseas fossil fuel power financing through 2018 from these three countries will lock in 24 Gt CO2 emissions by 2060. If climate targets are to be met, replacing bilateral fossil fuel financing with financing of renewable technologies is crucial.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ad62eca4263d615b88ebdhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117318
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Chinese Overseas Development Financing of Electric Power Generation: A Comparative Analysis2020 · 70 citations
  2. 2How Rising Powers Create Governance Gaps: The Case of Export Credit and the Environment2019 · 18 citations
  3. 3POWER SHIFT: SHIFTING G20 INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC FINANCE FROM COAL TO RENEWABLES2018 · 18 citations
  4. 4Key threshold for electricity emissions2015 · 48 citations
  5. 5Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development2018 · 296 citations