PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Atmospheric chemistry and physics1 citationsOpen Access

Melt period methane emissions in northern high latitude wetlands are governed by the length of the period and presence of permafrost

SHSara HyvärinenMTMaria K. TenkanenATAki Tsuruta

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract. Northern high latitude wetlands are significant sources of methane, with emissions driven by seasonal soil freezing and thawing. To better understand the seasonality of northern high latitude methane emissions, we defined the melt period occurring in spring time using the remote sensing Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity Freeze/Thaw data from 2011–2021. To estimate methane emissions in the northern high latitudes, we used the atmospheric inverse model CarbonTracker Europe-CH4. The melt period was defined for three permafrost zones and for a seasonally frozen non-permafrost region using two approaches: region-based, which considered climatological conditions of permafrost regions, and grid-based, which defines the melt period at a finer 1°×1° scale. The length and timing of the melt period varied significantly depending on the approach. The melt period generally occurred between March and June and was influenced by air temperature, with a negative correlation between the length and the mean temperature of the melt period. The longest melt period was in the non-permafrost zone and the shortest varied between the two methods. The melt period emissions were on average 1.83 Tg with the region-based approach and 0.45 Tg with the grid-based approach, the non-permafrost zone having the largest share of the emissions. They were largely dependent on the season’s length. Year-to-year variation was modest, within 15 % (region-based) and 23 % (grid-based) of average emissions, and there was also no trend during the study period. Our dual-method approach allows for robust comparison with both large-scale regional studies and localized site-level research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hyvärinen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1b1349bba2ed0c510c7c1ahttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7555-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Utilizing Earth Observations of Soil Freeze/Thaw Data and Atmospheric Concentrations to Estimate Cold Season Methane Emissions in the Northern High Latitudes2021 · 31 citations
  2. 2The SMOS Mission: New Tool for Monitoring Key Elements ofthe Global Water Cycle2010 · 2,024 citations
  3. 3Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–20162017 · 2,588 citations
  4. 4Annual methane emission from Finnish mires estimated from eddy covariance campaign measurements2001 · 161 citations
  5. 5A comprehensive evaluation of soil moisture and soil temperature from third‐generation atmospheric and land reanalysis data sets2020 · 256 citations