PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 31, 2001International Journal of Sports Medicine32 citations

Modification of Forearm Vascular Function Following Short-Term Handgrip Exercise Training

View Full Paper
MAMahmoud A. AlomariMWMichael A. WelschRPRhonda D. Prisby

Key Result

Short-term handgrip exercise training at low or high intensity significantly increased forearm blood flow following occlusion, with no significant difference between intensity groups (p=0.632).

Structured PICO

Does short-term handgrip exercise training improve localized vascular function in healthy men?

P
Population
28 healthy men (age: 23 +/- 4.3)
I
Intervention
4-week program of non-dominant handgrip exercise performed 5 days/week for 20 minutes at either low (25% of maximum voluntary contraction) or high (75% of maximum voluntary contraction) intensity
C
Comparator
Pre-training baseline and comparison between low and high intensity groups
O
Outcome
Forearm blood flow evaluated pre- and post-training at rest, following forearm occlusion, and following forearm occlusion combined with handgrip exercise using strain gauge plethysmographysurrogate

Short-term handgrip exercise training improves unilateral vasodilatory responsiveness in healthy men, with the degree of improvement appearing independent of the training intensity.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 20.72% vs 16.51%

p-value: p=0.632

Abstract

This study examined the effect of low (25% of maximum voluntary contraction) and high (75% of maximum voluntary contraction) intensity short-term handgrip exercise training on localized vascular function. Forearm blood flow was evaluated in twenty-eight healthy men (age: 23 +/- 4.3) pre- and post-training in both forearms at rest, following forearm occlusion and following forearm occlusion combined with handgrip exercise using strain gauge plethysmography. The 4-week program consisted of non-dominant handgrip exercise performed 5 d/wk for 20 min at either low or high intensity. Following training a significant increase in forearm blood flow was noted for the nondominant arm in both groups after forearm occlusion (low intensity group: 16.51%; high intensity group: 20.72%; p = 0.001) and forearm occlusion combined with handgrip exercise (low intensity group: 17.71%; high intensity group: 29.27%; p = 0.001). No significant group by test interaction (p = 0.632) was found. These data show improved unilateral vasodilatory responsiveness after short-term handgrip training. In addition, the degree of change is most notable following the greatest vasodilatory stimulus. Lastly, a lack of group by treatment interaction suggests the change may be independent of training stimulus.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alomari et al. (2001) studied Healthy (n=28). Handgrip exercise training vs. Low intensity (25% of maximum voluntary contraction) handgrip exercise was evaluated on Increase in forearm blood flow after forearm occlusion (p=0.632). Short-term handgrip exercise training at low or high intensity significantly increased forearm blood flow following occlusion, with no significant difference between intensity groups (p=0.632).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1b4b72d426719c76abaeeehttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-15654
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper