PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 13, 2000Archives of Internal Medicine62 citations

An Overview of the 4 Randomized Trials of Aspirin Therapy in the Primary Prevention of Vascular Disease

View Full Paper
PHP R HebertOklahoma State UniversityCHC H HennekensHarvard University

Structured PICO

Does aspirin therapy reduce vascular disease endpoints in subjects for primary prevention?

P
Population
More than 51,000 subjects across 4 randomized trials for the primary prevention of vascular disease
I
Intervention
Aspirin therapy
O
Outcome
Various vascular disease end points including nonfatal myocardial infarction, any important vascular event, vascular disease-related death, nonfatal stroke, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic strokehard clinical

In primary prevention, aspirin significantly reduces the risk of first nonfatal myocardial infarction and overall vascular events, though it may increase the risk of hemorrhagic stroke.

Limitations

  • Inadequate numbers of events to determine effect on vascular disease-related death or stroke
  • More data needed on hemorrhagic stroke
  • More randomized trial data needed especially in women but also in men

Abstract

Background In the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, in contrast to the recommendations of the American College of Chest Physicians and the American Heart Association, the US Food and Drug Administration recently stated that there was insufficient evidence to judge whether aspirin therapy decreases the risk of a first myocardial infarction. Objective To perform an overview of the 4 primary prevention trials of aspirin therapy to obtain the most reliable estimates of the effects of aspirin therapy on various vascular disease end points. Methods and Results These 4 trials included more than 51,000 subjects and 2284 important vascular events. Those assigned to aspirin therapy experienced significant reductions of 32% (95% confidence interval CI, 21%-41%) for nonfatal myocardial infarction and 13% (95% CI, 5%-19%) for any important vascular event. There were possible small but nonsignificant increases in risks of vascular disease–related death (1%; 95% CI, −12% to 16%) and nonfatal stroke (8%; 95% CI, −12% to 33%). When strokes were subdivided by type, there was no significant effect of aspirin therapy on the risk of ischemic stroke, but, while based on small numbers, there was a 1.7-fold apparent increase (95% CI, 6%-269%) in the risk of hemorrhagic stroke, which did achieve statistical significance. Conclusions For the primary prevention of vascular disease, aspirin therapy confers significant beneficial effects on first myocardial infarction and, as a result, on any important vascular event; these effects are clinically important. Whether there is any reduction in vascular disease–related death or stroke associated with treatment remains unclear because of inadequate numbers of events in the primary prevention trials completed to date. More data on hemorrhagic stroke are also needed. In addition, randomized trial data, especially in women but also in men, are needed to help to formulate a rational public health policy for individuals at usual risk. Meanwhile, these data provide evidence for a significant benefit of aspirin therapy in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hebert et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bc85d0a1f7575939ce63fhttps://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.20.3123
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper