PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2000BMJ119 citationsOpen Access

Determination of who may derive most benefit from aspirin in primary prevention: subgroup results from a randomised controlled trial

TMT W MeadePBP J Brennan

Structured PICO

Does low dose aspirin reduce myocardial infarction, coronary death, and stroke in men aged 45-69 years at increased risk of coronary heart disease?

P
Population
5499 men aged between 45 and 69 years at entry who were at increased risk of coronary heart disease
I
Intervention
Low dose aspirin
O
Outcome
Myocardial infarction, coronary death, and strokehard clinical

The cardiovascular benefits of low-dose aspirin in primary prevention appear to be concentrated in patients with lower systolic blood pressures, whereas those with higher pressures may face bleeding risks without corresponding benefit.

Limitations

  • limitations of subgroup analyses

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine which groups of patients may derive particular benefit or experience harm from the use of low dose aspirin for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 108 group practices in the Medical Research Council's general practice research framework who were taking part in the thrombosis prevention trial. PARTICIPANTS: 5499 men aged between 45 and 69 years at entry who were at increased risk of coronary heart disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Myocardial infarction, coronary death, and stroke. RESULTS: Aspirin reduced coronary events by 20%. This benefit, mainly for non-fatal events, was significantly greater the lower the systolic blood pressure at entry (interaction P=0.0015), the relative risk at pressures 130 mm Hg being 0.55 compared with 0.94 at pressures >145 mm Hg. Aspirin also reduced strokes at low but not high pressures, the relative risks being 0.41 and 1.42 (P=0.006) respectively. The relative risk of all major cardiovascular events-that is, the sum of coronary heart disease and stroke-was 0.59 at pressures 145 mm Hg (P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Even with the limitations of subgroup analyses the evidence suggests that the benefit of low dose aspirin in primary prevention may occur mainly in those with lower systolic blood pressures, although it is not clear even in these men that the benefit outweighs the potential hazards. Men with higher pressures may be exposed to the risks of bleeding while deriving no benefit through reductions in coronary heart disease and stroke.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meade et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bc85d0a1f7575939ce640https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7252.13
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Final Report on the Aspirin Component of the Ongoing Physicians' Health Study1989 · 2,271 citations
  2. 2Extra-Cranial Bleeding and Other Symptoms due to Low Dose Aspirin and Low Intensity Oral Anticoagulation1992 · 94 citations
  3. 3Does Aspirin Consumption Affect the Presentation or Severity of Acute Myocardial Infarction?1995 · 42 citations
  4. 4Randomized controlled trial of low dose warfarin in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in men at high risk: design and pilot study1988 · 54 citations
  5. 5Coronary heart disease case fatality in four countries. A community study. The Acute Myocardial Infarction Register Teams of Auckland, Augsburg, Bremen, FINMONICA, Newcastle, and Perth.1993 · 90 citations