PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 10, 2020EP Europace22 citationsOpen Access

Prospective use of ablation index for the ablation of right ventricle outflow tract premature ventricular contractions: a proof of concept study

View Full Paper
AGAlessio GasperettiRSRita SicusoARAntonio Dello Russo

Structured PICO

Does Ablation Index-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation reduce arrhythmic recurrence compared to standard ablation in patients with right ventricle outflow tract premature ventricular contractions?

P
Population
120 patients with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) originating from the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT). AI-guided group (n=60): mean age 44.2 ± 18.0 years, 58% male, mean LVEF 56.2 ± 3.8%.
I
Intervention
Ablation Index (AI)-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) with per-protocol target cut-offs (RVOT free wall: 590; RVOT septum: 610)
C
Comparator
Standard radiofrequency catheter ablation (propensity-matched for age, sex, ejection fraction, and PVC site)
O
Outcome
Arrhythmic recurrence at 6 months

Ablation Index-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation for RVOT PVCs significantly reduces arrhythmic recurrence at 6 months compared to standard ablation.

Abstract

AIMS: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) represents an effective option for idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) treatment. Ablation Index (AI) is a novel ablation marker incorporating RF power, contact force, and time of delivery into a single weighted formula. Data regarding AI-guided PVCs RFCA are currently lacking. Aim of the study was to compare AI-guided and standard RFCA outcomes in patients with PVCs originating from the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing AI-guided RFCA of RVOT idiopathic PVCs were prospectively enrolled. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed following per-protocol target cut-offs of AI, depending on targeted area (RVOT free wall AI cut-off: 590; RVOT septum AI cut-off: 610). A multi-centre cohort of propensity-matched (age, sex, ejection fraction, and PVC site) patients undergoing standard PVCs RFCA was used as a comparator. Sixty AI-guided patients (44.2 ± 18.0 years old, 58% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 56.2 ± 3.8%) were enrolled; 34 (57%) were ablated in RVOT septum and 26 (43%) patients in the RVOT free wall area. Propensity match with 60 non-AI-guided patients was performed. Acute outcomes and complications resulted comparable. At 6 months, arrhythmic recurrence was more common in non-AI-guided patients whether in general (28% vs. 7% P = 0.003) or by ablated area (RVOT free wall: 27% vs. 4%, P = 0.06; RVOT septum 29% vs. 9% P = 0.05). Ablation Index guidance was associated with improved survival from arrhythmic recurrence overall odds ratio 6.61 (1.95-22.35), P = 0.001; RVOT septum 5.99 (1.21-29.65), P = 0.028; RVOT free wall 11.86 (1.12-124.78), P = 0.039. CONCLUSION: Ablation Index-guidance in idiopathic PVCs ablation was associated with better arrhythmic outcomes at 6 months of follow-up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gasperetti et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bce581567d2fc4d5f0a97https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa228
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper