PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 29, 2005ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)242 citations

Methodological approaches to determining the marine radiocarbon reservoir effect

View Full Paper
PAPhilippa AscoughGCGordon CookADAndrew Dugmore

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The marine radiocarbon reservoir effect is an offset in 14C age between contemporaneous organisms from the terrestrial environment and organisms that derive their carbon from the marine environment. Quantification of this effect is of crucial importance for correct calibration of the 14 C ages of marine-influenced samples to the calendrical timescale. This is fundamental to the construction of archaeological and palaeoenvironmental chronologies when such samples are employed in 14 C analysis. Quantitative measurements of temporal variations in regional marine reservoir ages also have the potential to be used as a measure of process changes within Earth surface systems, due to their link with climatic and oceanic changes. The various approaches to quantification of the marine radiocarbon reservoir effect are assessed, focusing particularly on the North Atlantic Ocean. Currently, the global average marine reservoir age of surface waters, R(t), is c. 400 radiocarbon years; however, regional values deviate from this as a function of climate and oceanic circulation systems. These local deviations from R(t) are expressed as +R values. Hence, polar waters exhibit greater reservoir ages (δR = c. +400 to +800 14 C y) than equatorial waters (δR = c. 0 14 C y). Observed temporal variations in δR appear to reflect climatic and oceanographic changes. We assess three approaches to quantification of marine reservoir effects using known age samples (from museum collections), tephra isochrones (present onshore/offshore) and paired marine/terrestrial samples (from the same context in, for example, archaeological sites). The strengths and limitations of these approaches are evaluated using examples from the North Atlantic region. It is proposed that, with a suitable protocol, accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) measurements on paired, short-lived, single entity marine and terrestrial samples from archaeological deposits is the most promising approach to constraining changes over at least the last 5 ky BP.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ascough et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bcee3b33628da419ce3f0https://doi.org/10.1191/0309133305pp461ra
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The impacts of bioturbation on the age difference between benthic and planktonic foraminifera in deep sea sediments1984 · 77 citations
  2. 2Contribution of metabolic carbon to mollusc and barnacle shell carbonate1986 · 212 citations
  3. 3Discordant Ages Related to Reservoir Effect of Associated Archaeologic Remains from the Tunel Site, Beagle Channel, Argentine Republic1986 · 33 citations
  4. 4Recent Reservoir Ages for Danish Fjords and Marine Waters1995 · 106 citations
  5. 5Radiocarbon dating and marine reservoir correction of Viking Age Christian burials from Orkney2000 · 67 citations