PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026Information Processing in Agriculture0 citationsOpen Access

Biological mechanism-based intelligent predictive control method for light environment optimization in vertical plant factories for Oryza Sativa seedling

View Full Paper
LWLiwei WangYYYubo YangZZZhigang Zhang

Key Points

  • This research aims to optimize light environment management in vertical plant factories for rice seedlings using advanced predictive control.
  • Developed NMPC-PAR-LSTM framework integrating Michaelis-Menten kinetics model, LSTM network, and NMPC optimizer.
  • Compared performance of NMPC-PAR-LSTM against Linear MPC, LSTM-MPC, and MPC-PAR-LSTM.
  • Measured cumulative tracking error and control stability under varying conditions.
  • Achieved a cumulative tracking error of 136 μmol·m −2 ·s −1, reducing errors by 91.6% compared to Linear MPC (1610.6).
  • Control stability observed with an input variation rate of 4.2%, significantly better than Linear MPC (26.0%) and LSTM-MPC (88.3%).
  • Demonstrated that aligning lighting with crop physiological needs contributes to sustainable agricultural practices.

Abstract

In vertical plant factories, dynamic light management tailored to crop developmental stages is essential yet unattainable through conventional fixed-lighting approaches. This study presents an integrated control framework termed NMPC-PAR-LSTM, which synergizes three functional modules: a Michaelis-Menten kinetics model that generates growth-stage-specific photosynthetic targets, an LSTM network that forecasts environmental variations over a 20-step-ahead horizon, and an NMPC optimizer incorporating physiological constraints. Comparative evaluation demonstrates that the NMPC-PAR-LSTM system achieves a cumulative tracking error of 136 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 , representing reductions of 91.6% relative to Linear MPC (1610.6), 90.6% relative to LSTM-MPC (1451), and 45.2% relative to MPC-PAR-LSTM (248). The framework also exhibits superior control stability, with an input variation rate of only 4.2%, compared to 26.0% for Linear MPC and 88.3% for LSTM-MPC. By aligning supplemental lighting with the physiological demands of crops, this approach provides a viable pathway toward sustainable vertical agriculture.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd0155783ba022b6fbf4ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2026.05.010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper