PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment for bovine respiratory disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the European Network for Optimization of Antimicrobial Therapy guidelines.

View Full Paper
KSKarolina ScahillLCLuís Pédro CarmoRYRamazan Yildiz

Key Points

  • This review assesses the clinical effectiveness of NSAIDs for bovine respiratory disease, both as adjunctive and sole therapy.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in cattle with naturally occurring BRD.
  • Included 17 RCTs involving 4,909 animals, comparing NSAID plus antimicrobial versus antimicrobial alone.
  • Utilized risk ratios and random-effects pairwise meta-analyses for primary and secondary outcomes.
  • NSAID addition did not significantly reduce re-treatment (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84-1.05; moderate certainty).
  • Limited evidence for NSAID monotherapy versus antimicrobials (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.72-1.97; very low certainty).
  • Studies emphasize the need for better pain/welfare measures and performance metrics in future trials.

Abstract

Background Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used as ancillary therapy for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) alongside antimicrobials, and interest in NSAID monotherapy has grown amid antimicrobial stewardship and welfare concerns. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of NSAIDs for BRD as adjunctive or sole therapy.Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cattle with naturally occurring BRD. Databases searched were MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CAB Abstracts (Ovid), Biological Abstracts (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus (search: 22 Apr 2024; update: 12 Sep 2025). Primary outcomes were short-term treatment failure (need for re-treatment); secondary outcomes included relapse, mortality, adverse events, and performance where available. Random-effects pairwise meta-analyses estimated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs. Risk of bias was assessed with a modified RoB 2.0 tool; certainty of evidence was appraised using GRADE. Registration/protocol: this review extends a prior ENOVAT BRD protocol; no separate registration was created. Funding: COST Action CA18217.Results Seventeen RCTs (22 comparisons; 4,909 animals) compared NSAID+antimicrobial versus antimicrobial alone. Adding an NSAID did not reduce re-treatment (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84-1.05; I 2 = 0%; moderate certainty). Subgroup (same vs different antimicrobial) and sensitivity analyses (handling of multi-arm trials; follow-up restricted to ≤14 or ≤ 10 days; risk-of-bias restrictions) did not change conclusions. Two RCTs in UK dairy calves compared NSAID monotherapy with antimicrobial monotherapy (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.72-1.97; very low certainty). Re-treatment is an indirect outcome and may not capture analgesia, fever reduction, or growth effects.Conclusions Across RCTs, NSAID use did not confer a clinically relevant reduction in re-treatment when added to antimicrobials, and evidence is very uncertain for NSAID monotherapy versus antimicrobials. Future trials should include validated pain/welfare measures, clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes, and performance metrics, with pathogen identification to explore effect modification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scahill et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd0845783ba022b6fc4bbhttps://doi.org/10.48620/97997
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment for bovine respiratory disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the European Network for Optimization of Antimicrobial Therapy guidelines2026
  2. 2Efficacy of antimicrobial treatment for bovine respiratory disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis for European Network for Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Therapy guidelines2026
  3. 3Efficacy of antimicrobial treatment for bovine respiratory disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis for European Network for Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Therapy guidelines2026 · 2 citations
  4. 4randomized trial comparing the effects of tulathromycin, tildipirosin and gamithromycin used as first treatment for clinical bovine respiratory disease in commercial feedlot steers2024
  5. 5Non-steroidal anti-inflammatories for analgesia in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials2023