PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology0 citations

Population Pharmacokinetics of Oral Gecacitinib in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases

View Full Paper
QMQingheng MengYZYuansheng ZhaoWCWenyang Chen

Key Points

  • To develop population pharmacokinetic models for gecacitinib and its metabolites to evaluate influencing factors.
  • Data was pooled from nine clinical trials involving healthy subjects and patients.
  • Population pharmacokinetic models were developed using NONMEM.
  • Covariates such as sex, age, and drug interactions were tested for their effects on pharmacokinetics.
  • Gecacitinib follows a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and linear elimination.
  • ZG0244 and ZG0245 are described by two-compartment and one-compartment models, respectively.
  • A strong CYP3A inhibitor increased exposure by approximately 1.3-fold.

Abstract

Abstract Gecacitinib is a novel, broad‐spectrum Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor being developed for the treatment of myelofibrosis, severe alopecia areata, ankylosing spondylitis, and atopic dermatitis. This study aimed to develop population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models for gecacitinib and its metabolites ZG0244 and ZG0245 to evaluate influential factors. Data from healthy subjects and patients across nine clinical trials were pooled. PopPK models were developed using NONMEM, and covariates of interest were tested. The PopPK structure for gecacitinib was a two‐compartment model with first‐order absorption and linear elimination. The metabolite ZG0244 was best described by a two‐compartment model with Michaelis–Menten formation and linear elimination, while for metabolite ZG0245, it was a one‐compartment model with Michaelis–Menten formation and linear elimination. Statistically significant factors affecting pharmacokinetic parameters included sex, age, indication, and co‐administration with a strong CYP3A inducer or inhibitor. The effects of sex, age, and strong CYP3A inducer on exposure were limited, requiring no dose adjustment. A strong CYP3A inhibitor increased exposure by approximately 1.3‐fold. The median time to reach 95% of steady‐state concentration was approximately 3 days for gecacitinib and ZG0244, and approximately 7 days for ZG0245. This study developed population pharmacokinetic models for gecacitinib and its metabolites, and quantified the effects of covariates.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd0fa5783ba022b6fca0fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70214
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper