PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching0 citations

Coaching leadership behaviors and athletes’ psychological resilience: The role of autonomy-supportive and relational coaching practices

View Full Paper
ÜÇÜlkü ÇOBANMUMerve UcaEAEdnan Ayvaz

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how athletes' perceptions of coaching leadership behaviors influence their psychological resilience.
  • Analyzed the relationship between coaching leadership behaviors and psychological resilience using hierarchical regression analyses.
  • Involved 181 athletes from various sports who reported on their experiences of coaching and resilience.
  • Considered demographic characteristics along with sport participation levels to evaluate contextual factors.
  • Leadership behaviors accounted for significant variance in resilience, beyond demographic factors.
  • Higher social support and lower levels of autocratic coaching correlated with greater resilience.
  • Democratic behavior and training had no significant impact when all leadership dimensions were evaluated.

Abstract

Psychological resilience is an important resource that helps athletes cope with stress and maintain performance in sport settings, and coaching leadership behaviors may play a role in shaping this capacity. This study examined the relationship between athletes’ perceptions of coaching leadership and psychological resilience using hierarchical regression analyses. A total of 181 athletes (39.8% women) from different sport disciplines completed measures of leadership behaviors, resilience, and demographic characteristics. The results showed that leadership behaviors explained a significant proportion of variance in resilience beyond demographic factors. Higher social support and lower levels of autocratic coaching were associated with greater resilience, whereas democratic behavior and training and instruction did not contribute significantly when all leadership dimensions were considered together. Athletes with more years of sport experience reported higher resilience, while age and other demographic variables were not significant. Sport participation level was also examined as an additional contextual factor. These findings indicate that supportive coaching practices and lower controlling behaviors are associated with athletes’ ability to cope with challenges in sport contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

ÇOBAN et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd12d5783ba022b6fcbbbhttps://doi.org/10.1177/17479541261455504
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Compassion matters in elite sports environments: Insights from high-performance coaches2024 · 20 citations
  2. 2An examination of the relationship between sport performers’ organizational stressor dimensions, physical health, and well-being2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior2000 · 33,460 citations
  4. 4Psychosocial facets of resilience: implications for preventing posttrauma psychopathology, treating trauma survivors, and enhancing community resilience2014 · 247 citations
  5. 5Integrating the Mindfulness-Acceptance-Commitment framework with Self-Determination Theory principles to promote Need-Supportive Sport Coaching2025 · 3 citations