PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026Dermatologic Surgery2 citations

Aesthetic Concerns and Nonsurgical Treatment Trends in Patients With GLP-1 Agonist–Associated Weight Loss

View Full Paper
SFSabrina FabiJYJ. YooJKJoely Kaufman-Janette

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify aesthetic concerns linked to GLP-1 agonist-induced weight loss and current trends in nonsurgical treatments.
  • Electronic survey distributed to healthcare professionals experienced with GLP-1 agonist patients.
  • Survey respondents included dermatologists, plastic surgeons, and other specialists.
  • Data collected on treatment trends and aesthetic concerns related to weight loss.
  • 406 healthcare professionals completed the survey, treating an average of 1,249 cosmetic patients annually.
  • 137% increase in patients receiving GLP-1 agonists from 2023 to 2024 as reported by HCPs.
  • HCPs identified midface volume loss, skin laxity, and stubborn fat as primary aesthetic concerns, with hyaluronic acid favored for treating facial issues in 47% of patients.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Weight loss associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists is frequently accompanied by reduced facial fat, sagging skin, and stubborn pockets of body fat. OBJECTIVE To identify aesthetic concerns related to GLP-1 agonist–associated weight loss and current nonsurgical treatment trends. MATERIALS AND METHODS An electronic survey was sent to health care professionals (HCPs) who were part of 3 large, opt-in databases. HCPs must have had experience treating patients with aesthetic concerns after GLP-1 agonists. RESULTS The 406 HCPs who completed the survey ( n = 100 dermatologists, n = 100 plastic surgeons, n = 105 physicians in other specialties, n = 101 nurses/physician assistants) reported treating a mean of 1,249 cosmetic patients per year. HCPs reported a mean increase of 137% in the number of patients receiving GLP-1 agonists from 2023 to 2024. HCPs perceive midface volume loss, face/neck skin laxity, and loose or sagging body skin to be the aesthetic changes most impacted by GLP-1 agonists, with patients also reportedly concerned about stubborn pockets of fat. Hyaluronic acid was considered the best treatment for facial concerns for an average of 47% of patients. CONCLUSION This large survey of HCPs representing various specialties provides insights into patient face- and body-related aesthetic concerns associated with GLP-1–mediated weight loss.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fabi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd2675783ba022b6fdecehttps://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000005166
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prevalence Patterns of Body Contouring Procedures Among Injectable Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Users2024 · 26 citations
  2. 2Tirzepatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Obesity2022 · 3,573 citations
  3. 3Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes2023 · 2,973 citations
  4. 4GLP-1 agonists: US sees 700% increase over four years in number of patients without diabetes starting treatment2024 · 68 citations
  5. 5Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity2021 · 4,958 citations