PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Equity, diversity, and inclusion in post-secondary student mental health and well-being research: A scoping review protocol

View Full Paper
SRSandy RaoAOAyomide OlayinkaRBRya Buckley

Key Points

  • This review aims to systematically explore how equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) are integrated into mental health research for post-secondary students.
  • Conducted according to JBI methodology for scoping reviews, using the Population–Concept–Context framework.
  • Implemented a three-step search strategy across multiple electronic databases, supplemented by grey literature.
  • Utilized title and abstract screening by independent reviewers, followed by full-text screening and structured data extraction.
  • No previous synthesis exists examining EDI integration in post-secondary student mental health research.
  • The review aims to identify gaps in EDI conceptualization and operationalization within this field.

Abstract

Objective The objective of this scoping review is to systematically identify and map the extent, range, and nature of research that explicitly articulates Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) within post-secondary student (PSS) mental health and well-being research, and to describe how EDI is conceptualized, operationalized, and implemented across study designs and research processes. Introduction Research addressing PSS mental health and well-being has grown substantially; concurrently, EDI has become a prominent institutional and research priority within post-secondary systems. Despite this convergence, no evidence synthesis has systematically examined how EDI is explicitly integrated into PSS mental health and well-being research. Inclusion criteria This review will include research studies of any design that explicitly articulate EDI within PSS mental health and well-being research. Eligible studies must focus on students enrolled in accredited post-secondary institutions and examine mental health or well-being within post-secondary education contexts. Methods The review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews and guided by the Population–Concept–Context framework. A three-step search strategy will be implemented. Electronic database searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, and Scopus or Web of Science, supplemented by targeted searches of eligible grey literature and reference list screening. Records will undergo title and abstract screening by two independent reviewers, followed by full-text screening. Data will be extracted using a structured, pilot-tested tool designed to capture how EDI is defined, framed, and integrated across stages of the research process. Extracted data will be synthesized using descriptive summary statistics, basic qualitative content analysis, and tabular and graphical mapping to address the review questions. The protocol was developed through sustained engagement with PSS with lived experience of mental health and well-being, including students from equity-deserving groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd2675783ba022b6fded4https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349684
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper