PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2010IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering127 citations

Multimodal Physical Activity Recognition by Fusing Temporal and Cepstral Information

View Full Paper
MLMing LiVRViktor RozgićGTGautam Thatte

Structured PICO

P
Population
Nine-category physical activity database
I
Intervention
Multimodal physical activity recognition algorithm fusing temporal and cepstral information from ECG and accelerometer signals
C
Comparator
State-of-the-art single accelerometer based physical activity recognition system
O
Outcome
Classification accuracy

A multimodal algorithm fusing ECG and accelerometer data significantly improves physical activity recognition accuracy compared to accelerometer-only systems.

Abstract

A physical activity (PA) recognition algorithm for a wearable wireless sensor network using both ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) and accelerometer signals is proposed. First, in the time domain, the cardiac activity mean and the motion artifact noise of the ECG signal are modeled by a Hermite polynomial expansion and principal component analysis, respectively. A set of time domain accelerometer features is also extracted. A support vector machine (SVM) is employed for supervised classification using these time domain features. Second, motivated by their potential for handling convolutional noise, cepstral features extracted from ECG and accelerometer signals based on a frame level analysis are modeled using Gaussian mixture models (GMMs). Third, to reduce the dimension of the tri-axial accelerometer cepstral features which are concatenated and fused at the feature level, heteroscedastic linear discriminant analysis is performed. Finally, to improve the overall recognition performance, fusion of the multimodal (ECG and accelerometer) and multidomain (time domain SVM and cepstral domain GMM) subsystems at the score level is performed. The classification accuracy ranges from 79.3% to 97.3% for various testing scenarios and outperforms the state-of-the-art single accelerometer based PA recognition system by over 24% relative error reduction on our nine-category PA database.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd2a25b8f4ede65a91ba5https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2010.2053217
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper