PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026Energies0 citationsOpen Access

Techno-Economic Dispatch Optimization of Integrated Energy Systems with Electric Vehicle Participation Considering Incentive Saturation Effects

View Full Paper
LCLe ChenLZLinjun ZengHXHui Xiao

Key Points

  • This research aims to optimize the dispatch of integrated energy systems with electric vehicle participation while considering incentive saturation effects.
  • Developed a mixed-integer linear programming model for a 24-hour period.
  • Evaluated interaction among incentive intensity, multi-energy load response, and operating costs.
  • Analyzed load response in the context of physical operating constraints.
  • The low-incentive strategy showed the best economic performance due to lower operating costs compared to high-incentive scenarios.
  • Demand response increased with incentive intensity, but the corresponding cost also rose, indicating saturation.
  • Electric vehicle loads were identified as the primary source of flexibility, constrained by thermal and gas load limits.

Abstract

Large-scale electric vehicle (EV) integration provides considerable flexibility for integrated energy systems (IESs), but stronger incentives do not always yield proportional demand response benefits under physical operating limits. This paper proposes a techno-economic dispatch optimization framework for an IES incorporating a Kalina Cycle (KC), power-to-gas (P2G) technology, and hydrogen storage. A 24 h mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model is developed to evaluate the interaction among the incentive intensity, multi-energy load response, and operating cost under different integrated demand response (IDR) scenarios. The results show a saturation-like response pattern: as the incentive intensity increases, the total operating cost rises monotonically, while the total demand response does not increase proportionally. In the studied case, the low-incentive strategy achieves the best economic performance because the additional compensation paid under high-incentive scenarios outweighs the marginal operating-cost savings. Load response analysis further indicates that EV-dominated electrical loads provide the main flexibility, whereas thermal and gas loads are strongly constrained by physical balance and equipment limits. The ablation results show that the saturation trajectory is affected by physical flexibility resources, especially the hydrogen subsystem. These findings suggest that incentive design should be coordinated with system physical constraints to avoid over-incentivization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd2ab5783ba022b6fe1cbhttps://doi.org/10.3390/en19112631
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper