PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 26, 2021Fluids5 citationsOpen Access

Flow Dynamics in a Model of a Left Ventricle with Different Mitral Valve Orientations

GMGhassan MaraouchLKLyes Kadem

Structured PICO

Does mitral valve annulus angulation alter flow dynamics and ventricular stasis in a left ventricle model?

P
Population
Model of a left ventricle
I
Intervention
Slightly angled (20°) and highly angled (46°) mitral valve annulus orientations
C
Comparator
Healthy mitral valve orientation
O
Outcome
Flow dynamics including circulation rotation, viscous energy dissipation, and stasis (cardiac cycles to evacuate 99% of initial ventricle volume)surrogate

In a left ventricle model, a healthy mitral valve orientation minimizes stasis and optimizes flow dynamics compared to angled orientations.

Abstract

The formation of vortex rings at valve leaflets during ventricular inflow has been a topic of interest for many years. It is generally accepted nowadays that the purpose of vortex rings is to conserve energy, reduce the workload on the heart, and minimize particle residence time. We investigated these claims by testing three different levels of annulus angle for the mitral valve: a healthy case, a slightly angled case (20°), and a highly angled case (46°). Circulation was determined to be reversed in the non-healthy case, with a dominant counterclockwise rotation instead of clockwise. Viscous energy dissipation was highest in the slightly angled case, followed by the healthy case and then the highly angled case. A Lagrangian analysis demonstrated that the healthy case resulted in the least amount of stasis, requiring eight cardiac cycles to evacuate 99% of initial ventricle volume compared to the 16 and 13 cardiac cycles required by the slightly angled and highly angled cases, respectively.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maraouch et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd4cebc71fb1015a90478https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6120428
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper