PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 30, 2009Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis45 citations

Retrospective Analysis of Long‐term Lipid Apheresis at a Single Center

View Full Paper
MKMichael KoziolekUHUlrich HennigAZAntonia Zapf

Structured PICO

Does long-term lipid apheresis reduce major cardiovascular events in patients requiring lipid apheresis?

P
Population
n=38 patients consecutively treated with lipid apheresis over the last 20 years
I
Intervention
Long-term lipid apheresis (10,906 sessions including heparin-induced lipoprotein precipitation, direct adsorption of lipoproteins, double filtration plasmapheresis, dextran sulfate adsorption, and immunoadsorption)
C
Comparator
Historical control (rates before start of lipid apheresis)
O
Outcome
Incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE) (death, cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, limb amputation, and renal vascular involvement) separately or as a combined end-pointcomposite

Long-term lipid apheresis is safe and associated with a substantial reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity.

Abstract

We retrospectively analyzed 10 906 lipid apheresis sessions (heparin-induced lipoprotein precipitation, direct adsorption of lipoproteins, double filtration plasmapheresis, dextran sulfate adsorption, and immunoadsorption) in 38 patients who were consecutively treated in our department during the last 20 years. The incidences of major cardiovascular events (MACE) (death, cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, limb amputation, and renal vascular involvement) were taken separately as primary end-points or as a combined end-point. The time-course of secondary end-points (coronary and extracranial status of arteries, left ventricular function, occlusive artery disease, and calculated glomerular filtration rate cGFR) were also evaluated, as well as the extent of the reduction in plasma lipids and lipoproteins and the incidence of therapy associated side-effects. MACE decreased from 7.02% events per patient per year at the start of lipid apheresis to 1.17% during lipid apheresis and the rate of myocardial revascularization decreased from 22.8% to 3.8% per patient per year. Classical (diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and smoking history), as well as novel risk factors (cGFR < 60 mL/min, statin withdrawal, mixed hyperlipoproteinemia, and elevated lipoprotein (a)) were associated with an elevated risk for MACE. All applied methods had comparable effects. All lipid apheresis methods proved to be safe and suitable for long-term treatment. The present data demonstrate that treatment with lipid apheresis is very effective and leads to long-term reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koziolek et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd4fe6f692abb725eed02https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-9987.2009.00747.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Low–Density Lipoprotein Apheresis Versus Lipid Lowering Drugs in the Treatment of Severe Hypercholesterolemia: Four Years' Experience1996 · 13 citations
  2. 2Low‐density Lipoprotein Apheresis: An Overview2003 · 79 citations
  3. 3Usefulness of Lipid Apheresis in the Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia2014 · 13 citations
  4. 4Low Density Lipoprotein Apheresis in Treatment of Hyperlipidemia: Experience with Four Different Technologies2000 · 17 citations
  5. 5Low‐Density Lipoprotein Apheresis: Clinical Results with Different Methods2002 · 26 citations