PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1989Annals of Internal Medicine34 citations

Famotidine Therapy for Active Duodenal Ulcers

View Full Paper
JRJames C. Reynolds

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that influence the rate of healing of duodenal ulcers. DESIGN: A stepwise multivariable statistical analysis of patients with duodenal ulcer in a multicenter, prospective, open-label study. Healing was assessed by endoscopy at 4 or 8 weeks. Antacid use and symptoms were recorded in a daily diary. SUBJECTS: Of 135 patients, ages 19 to 86, 50% had a previous duodenal ulcer, 46.7% smoked, and 34.8% had melena or hematemesis. INTERVENTIONS: Famotidine, 40 mg orally, at bedtime for 4 or 8 weeks depending on endoscopic evaluation of ulcer healing. Limited antacid use was permitted. SETTING: Office practices, hospital practices, and university-based medical centers. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multivariable analysis identified five independent predictors present at the time of diagnosis that influenced ulcer healing. The odds of not healing for each risk factor after simultaneous adjustment of the other risk factors were as follows: alcohol use, 6.5 (CI, 2.0 to 20.7, P less than 0.002); ulcer size greater than 10 mm, 4.2 (CI, 1.5 to 11.6, P less than 0.005), bleeding symptoms. 3.5 (CI, 1.2 to 10.2, P less than 0.03); and a previous duodenal ulcer, 3.1 (CI, 1.05 to 9.0, P less than 0.04). The use of salicylates or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs before treatment was associated with an improved odds of healing (adjusted odds ratio, 0.2; CI, 0.1 to 0.9, P less than 0.04). The percentage of patients achieving complete ulcer healing after 4 weeks of famotidine decreased inversely with the number of risk factors present, ulcer size, and the quantity of daily alcohol use (P less than 0.001). Fewer than half of those patients who still had severe pain at day 7 achieved healing at 4 weeks (P less than 0.001). In contrast, smoking and 23 other factors had no statistically discernible effect on ulcer healing with famotidine. CONCLUSIONS: Five variables present at the time of diagnosis independently influenced the rate of ulcer healing at 4 weeks: alcohol use, ulcer size, bleeding symptoms, a previous duodenal ulcer, and previous use of salicylates or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

James C. Reynolds (1989) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bdda1ea84844e355f1643https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-111-1-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Gastric Ulcer. 3. Site and size of the ulcer as determinants of outcome.1971 · 23 citations
  2. 2Famotidine versus Ranitidine for the Short-Term Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer2009 · 27 citations
  3. 3Famotidine, a new H2-receptor antagonist, does not affect hepatic elimination of diazepam or tubular secretion of procainamide1985 · 54 citations
  4. 4Clinical Trial of Ranitidine in the Treatment of Peptic Ulcer1982 · 5 citations
  5. 5A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of nocturnal and twice-a-day famotidine in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer disease1987 · 54 citations