PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 30, 2004Journal of Clinical Oncology408 citationsOpen Access

Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Classic Type: Response to Primary Chemotherapy and Survival Outcomes

MCMassimo CristofanilliAGAna M. González-AnguloNSNour Sneige

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of histologic type invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) versus invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) on response to primary chemotherapy (PC) and long-term outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 1,034 patients with stage II and III breast cancer who participated in six clinical trials of PC at our institution between 1985 and 2002. One hundred twenty-two patients (12%) had ILC and 912 (88%) had IDC. All patients received anthracycline-based PC, and 346 patients (33.5%) also received a taxane as part of PC. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no evidence of invasive disease in the breast and axillary lymph nodes. RESULTS: The median patient age was 48 years (range, 18 to 79 years). Patients with ILC tended to be older (median age, 53 years v 47 years for patients with IDC) and have more hormone-receptor-positive tumors (92% v 62%; P 3 involved nodes; P = .001). At a median follow-up time of 70 months, ILC patients tended to have longer recurrence-free survival (P = .004) and overall survival (P = .001). CONCLUSION: ILC is characterized by lower rates of pathologic response to PC but better long-term outcomes compared to IDC. pCR might not be a prognostic indicator for this group of patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cristofanilli et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1be450ea84844e355f22d2https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.03.111
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper