Do exertional symptoms correlate with objective measures of circulatory dysfunction in patients with heart failure?
Exertional symptoms in heart failure patients correlate poorly with objective hemodynamic and metabolic measures during exercise, suggesting symptoms alone may not reliably reflect circulatory dysfunction.
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure frequently report exertional dyspnea and fatigue. These symptoms are usually attributed to circulatory dysfunction and therefore are typically treated with cardiovascular medications. Serial assessment of exertional symptoms has also become the principal method used to assess drug efficacy in heart failure. Nevertheless, the relation between exertional symptoms in heart failure and circulatory dysfunction remains uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was undertaken to investigate the relation between exertional symptoms, ventilatory and skeletal muscle dysfunction, and circulatory function in patients with heart failure. To this end, 52 ambulatory patients with heart failure underwent hemodynamic monitoring during maximal treadmill exercise testing. During exercise, the severity of dyspnea and fatigue was evaluated on a scale of 6 to 20 (Borg scale). The level of perceived exercise intolerance during daily activities was evaluated with the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Yale Dyspnea-Fatigue Index. Maximal treadmill exercise increased the VO2 to 13.4 +/- 2.8 mL.min-1.kg-1, the dyspnea score to 15.7 +/- 2.3, the fatigue score to 14.8 +/- 3.4, the pulmonary wedge pressure to 28 +/- 11 mm Hg, and the pulmonary artery lactate concentration to 34.5 +/- 16.3 mg/dL and decreased the pulmonary artery hemoglobin oxygen saturation to 30 +/- 9%. The level of perceived dyspnea had no relation to the pulmonary wedge pressure and correlated only minimally with the level of excessive ventilation (r = 39). The level of perceived fatigue correlated only weakly with blood lactate concentration (r = .55). Eleven patients (21%) exhibited a normal cardiac output and wedge pressure 20 mm Hg during exercise, and 19 (37%) exhibited reduced cardiac output and wedge pressure > 20 mm Hg during exercise. Despite these markedly different hemodynamic responses, all three groups exhibited similar levels of fatigue and dyspnea at comparable workloads and had comparable total scores for the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Yale Dyspnea-Fatigue Index. There was no relation between the Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and peak exercise VO2 and only a weak correlation between the Dyspnea-Fatigue Index and peak VO2 (r = .48). CONCLUSIONS: The level of exercise intolerance perceived by patients with heart failure has little or no relation to objective measures of circulatory, ventilatory, or metabolic dysfunction during exercise. In patients who report severe exertional symptoms, it may be desirable to directly measure hemodynamic response to exercise to ensure that these symptoms are due to circulatory dysfunction.
Wilson et al. (1995) studied this question.