PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1995Journal of Industrial Economics228 citationsOpen Access

Sunk Costs, Firm Size and Firm Growth

View Full Paper
LCLuı́s Cabral

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

For several decades, the conventional wisdom has been that expected firm growth rates are independent of firm size, a property known as Gibrat's Law. However, recent empirical work has found a negative relation between firm growth and firm size. This paper provides a theoretical explanation for this negative relation in a model of new firm growth where capacity and technology choices involve some degree of sunkness. Additional empirical implications of the theory of sunk costs are also developed. These relate to profit rates, Tobin's Q, exit rates, degree of sunkness of capacity costs, as well as size and growth rates. Copyright 1995 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Luı́s Cabral (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1be7da4d9126f09c5ed6cbhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2950479
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ENTRY, GIBRAT'S LAW, INNOVATION, AND THE GROWTH OF FIRMS1961 · 684 citations
  2. 2Growth, Acquisition Activity and Firm Size: Evidence from the United Kingdom1985 · 234 citations
  3. 3Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth1987 · 1,414 citations
  4. 4Irreversible Investment with Price Ceilings1991 · 143 citations
  5. 5Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition1982 · 2,875 citations