PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1982Perception252 citationsOpen Access

The Shape of Smooth Objects and the Way Contours End

View Full Paper
JKJan J. KoenderinkADAndrea J. van Doorn

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

It is shown, by elementary mathematical reasoning, that visual contours can only be concave at their endpoints. This simple natural fact is contrasted with general mannerisms of draftsmen: in the great majority of cases contours are drawn to have convex ends. It is argued that this results from our general concept of solid shapes: a general shape is conceived of as a conglomerate of convex (‘ovoid’) elementary shapes, these shapes act as ‘figure’ and the way they are glued together is treated as the—relatively unimportant—‘ground’. The hypothesis is supported through citations from academic-art literature. An attempt is made to give a geometrical specification of just what draftsmen draw if they disregard the contour.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koenderink et al. (1982) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bee1526cb5670aa9d1fa3https://doi.org/10.1068/p110129
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Media and Symbols: The Forms of Expression, Communication, and Education1974 · 143 citations
  2. 2Anschauliche Geometrie1932 · 283 citations
  3. 3Raumphantasien und Raumillusionen1963 · 4 citations
  4. 4Art and Visual Perception1976 · 435 citations
  5. 5The Ecological Approach To Visual Perception2013 · 2,601 citations