PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1986Circulation178 citations

Comparative accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler pressure half-time methods in assessing severity of mitral stenosis in patients with and without prior commissurotomy.

View Full Paper
MSMikel D. SmithRHRodney HandshoeSHSharon Handshoe

Structured PICO

How do two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler pressure half-time methods compare to cardiac catheterization for estimating mitral valve area in patients with pure mitral stenosis?

P
Population
74 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac catheterization for evaluation of pure mitral stenosis (37 with previous mitral commissurotomy, 37 unoperated). 6 patients were excluded due to inadequate images.
I
Intervention
Two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) and Doppler pressure half-time methods
C
Comparator
Cardiac catheterization measurements of mitral valve area (Gorlin formula)
O
Outcome
Accuracy of noninvasive estimation of mitral valve areasurrogate

This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of 2D echocardiography and Doppler pressure half-time against invasive catheterization for assessing mitral stenosis severity.

Limitations

  • Retrospective design
  • Abstract truncated

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare the accuracies of the two-dimensional echocardiographic (2DE) and Doppler pressure half-time methods for the noninvasive estimation of cardiac catheterization measurements of mitral valve area in patients with pure mitral stenosis both with and without a previous commissurotomy. Data were retrospectively obtained from 74 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac catheterization within a 30 month period for evaluation of mitral stenosis, and who had two-dimensional echocardiograms performed before catheterization. Six patients (8.1%) had technically inadequate 2DE images and their data were excluded from analysis. Two of these patients had undergone commissurotomy, while the remaining four had not. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic examinations were attempted in 45 patients and adequate measurements of pressure half-times were obtained in all patients studied. Mitral valve area by two-dimensional echocardiography was measured as the planimetered area along the inner border of the smallest mitral orifice visualized during short-axis scanning, while pressure half-time was calculated as the interval between the peak transmitral velocity and velocity/square root 2 as measured from the envelope of the Doppler spectral signal. Calculations from catheterization represented the minimal valve area at rest as derived from the Gorlin formula with the use of pressure gradients and thermodilution measurements of cardiac output. Thirty-seven of the patients had had a previous mitral commissurotomy a mean of 11.2 +/- 5.4 years before, while the remaining 37 patients were previously unoperated. Mean valve area as determined at catheterization for the total group of patients ranged from 0.37 to 2.30 cm2 (mean = 1.08 +/- 0.42 cm2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Smith et al. (1986) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bf38826cb5670aa9d278bhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.73.1.100
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Echocardiography1966 · 64 citations
  2. 2Reduction in the Rate of Diastolic Descent of the Mitral Valve Echogram in Patients with Altered Left Ventricular Diastolic Pressure-Volume Relations1974 · 94 citations
  3. 3Determination of Mitral Valve Area by Cross-Sectional Echocardiography1978 · 139 citations
  4. 4A reassessment of the echocardiogram in mitral stenosis.1975 · 84 citations
  5. 5An Appraisal of Mitral Valve Echocardiograms Mimicking Mitral Stenosis in Conditions with Right Ventricular Pressure Overload1973 · 39 citations