PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2009British Journal of Cancer193 citationsOpen Access

Do diagnostic delays in cancer matter?

View Full Paper
RNRichard D Neal

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom has poorer cancer outcomes than many other countries due partly to delays in diagnosing symptomatic cancer, leading to more advanced stage at diagnosis. Delays can occur at the level of patients, primary care, systems and secondary care. There is considerable potential for interventions to minimise delays and lead to earlier-stage diagnosis. METHODS: Scoping review of the published studies, with a focus on methodological issues. RESULTS: Trial data in this area are lacking and observational studies often show no association or negative ones. This review offers methodological explanations for these counter-intuitive findings. CONCLUSION: While diagnostic delays do matter, their importance is uncertain and must be determined through more sophisticated methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Richard D Neal (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bfbe5d54006be995f5939https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605384
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper