PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 24, 2021Journal of Electrocardiology11 citationsOpen Access

Feasibility study of a 3D camera to reduce electrode repositioning errors during longitudinal ECG acquisition

View Full Paper
RRRobert W. RoudijkMBMachteld BoonstraJRJanna Ruisch

Key Result

3D camera guided repositioning of precordial electrodes significantly reduced ECG waveform variation for the QRS complex compared to routine clinical ECGs (correlation 0.98 vs 0.90, p<0.001).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=20)

Structured PICO

Does 3D camera guided electrode repositioning reduce ECG waveform variability compared to routine clinical ECGs in subjects undergoing longitudinal monitoring?

P
Population
20 subjects undergoing routine clinical follow-up, mean age 65.1 ± 8.2 years, 35% females.
I
Intervention
3D camera guided ECG recording (two ECGs recorded guided by two 3D cameras to capture precordial electrode locations and direct repositioning)
C
Comparator
Routine clinical ECGs (three clinical ECGs obtained during routine clinical follow-up)
O
Outcome
ECG waveform variation (QRS complex and STT segment correlation coefficients) and QTc interval variationsurrogate

3D camera-guided repositioning of precordial electrodes significantly reduces ECG waveform and QTc variation compared to routine clinical placement, improving the reliability of longitudinal ECG monitoring.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0.98% vs 0.9%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Longitudinal monitoring of sometimes subtle waveform changes of the 12‑lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is complicated by patient-specific and technical factors, such as the inaccuracy of electrode repositioning. This feasibility study uses a 3D camera to reduce electrode repositioning errors, reduce ECG waveform variability and enable detailed longitudinal ECG monitoring. METHODS: Per subject, three clinical ECGs were obtained during routine clinical follow-up. Additionally, two ECGs were recorded guided by two 3D cameras, which were used to capture the precordial electrode locations and direct electrode repositioning. ECG waveforms and parameters were quantitatively compared between 3D camera guided ECGs and clinical ECGs. Euclidian distances between original and repositioned precordial electrodes from 3D guided ECGs were measured. RESULTS: Twenty subjects (mean age 65.1 ± 8.2 years, 35% females) were included. The ECG waveform variation between routine ECGs was significantly higher compared to 3D guided ECGs, for both the QRS complex (correlation coefficient = 0.90 vs 0.98, p < 0.001) and the STT segment (correlation coefficient = 0.88 vs. 0.96, p < 0.001). QTc interval variation was reduced for 3D camera guided ECGs compared to routine clinical ECGs (5.6 ms vs. 9.6 ms, p = 0.030). The median distance between 3D guided repositioned electrodes was 10.0 6.4-15.2 mm, and did differ between males and females (p = 0.076). CONCLUSIONS: 3D guided repositioning of precordial electrodes resulted in, a low repositioning error, higher agreement between waveforms of consecutive ECGs and a reduction of QTc variation. These findings suggest that longitudinal monitoring of disease progression using 12‑lead ECG waveforms is feasible in clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roudijk et al. (2021) reported an observational. 3D camera guided ECG vs. Routine clinical ECG was evaluated on QRS complex waveform variation (correlation coefficient) (p=<0.001). 3D camera guided repositioning of precordial electrodes significantly reduced ECG waveform variation for the QRS complex compared to routine clinical ECGs (correlation 0.98 vs 0.90, p<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c03e8d54006be995f67b5https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2021.03.006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper