Logistic regression demonstrated the highest accuracy of 82.7% and a ROC-AUC of 0.844 for predicting the presence of heart disease compared to other machine learning models.
Which machine learning algorithm demonstrates the best predictive performance for heart disease diagnosis in a clinical dataset?
Logistic Regression and Random Forest algorithms demonstrate high reliability and accuracy in predicting heart disease risk based on standard clinical attributes.
Absolute Event Rate: 82.7% vs 79%
The study aims to accurately predict the presence of heart disease using machine learning models. The research evaluates and compares the performance of five algorithms - Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting - on a dataset containing clinical features of patients. The primary research question is to identify which algorithm demonstrates the best predictive performance for heart disease diagnosis. The study used a dataset of 270 patients with 13 clinical features. The data was preprocessed, and target variables were converted into binary values for classification. The dataset was split into training and test sets in a 70-30 ratio. Five machine learning models were trained and evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. Confusion matrices were analyzed to gain additional insights into model performance. Logistic Regression and Random Forest showed the best results among all models, with an accuracy of 86.4 and 80.2%, respectively. The Logistic Regression showed a ROC-AUC score of 0.844, while the Random Forest showed a score of 0.88. The confusion matrices revealed the strengths and weaknesses of each model in terms of forecasting. Logistic Regression and Random Forest were identified as the most reliable models for predicting heart disease in this dataset. Future work will explore hyperparameter tuning and ensemble methods to further enhance model performance, providing valuable insights for early diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases.
Temirbayeva et al. (2025) studied Heart disease (n=270). Logistic Regression vs. Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting was evaluated on Accuracy of heart disease prediction. Logistic regression demonstrated the highest accuracy of 82.7% and a ROC-AUC of 0.844 for predicting the presence of heart disease compared to other machine learning models.