PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1998Journal of Hypertension22 citations

Contrasting renal effects of chronic administrations of enalapril and losartan on one-kidney, one clip hypertensive rats

View Full Paper
BDBénédicte DemeilliersBJBernard JoverAMA Mimran

Structured PICO

Does enalapril compared to losartan affect renal function differently in sodium-depleted rats with one-kidney, one clip hypertension?

P
Population
Sodium-depleted rats with one-kidney, one clip hypertension subjected to dietary sodium-intake restriction for 6 days prior to treatment
I
Intervention
Enalapril (10 mg/kg per day) for 6 days, with or without bradykinin B2-receptor antagonist Hoe 140 (300 microg/kg per day subcutaneously via osmotic pump)
C
Comparator
Losartan (30 mg/kg per day) for 6 days, and untreated rats
O
Outcome
Renal function assessed by clearance technique (glomerular filtration rate)surrogate

In a rat model of hypertension, enalapril reduced glomerular filtration rate more than losartan despite similar blood pressure reductions, an effect partially mediated by kinins.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of chronic administrations of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan and of the angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril on renal function in sodium-depleted rats with one-kidney, one clip hypertension, and to examine the contribution of endogenous kinins to the effect of enalapril. METHODS: We administered enalapril and losartan (10 and 30 mg/kg per day, respectively) for 6 days to hypertensive rats that had been subjected to dietary sodium-intake restriction for 6 days prior to treatment and continued to be subjected to this restriction during treatment. In an additional group, administration of enalapril was combined with infusion of the bradykinin B2-receptor antagonist Hoe 140 (300 microg/kg per day subcutaneously via an osmotic pump). Renal function of anesthetized rats was assessed by using a clearance technique. RESULTS: Despite there being similar falls in arterial pressure, glomerular filtration rate (867 +/- 40 microl/min per g kidney weight in untreated rats) was decreased to a larger extent in enalapril-treated than it was in losartan-treated rats (284 +/- 29 versus 438 +/- 36 microl/min per g kidney weight, P < 0.01). Although infusion of Hoe 140 had no influence on the effect of enalapril on arterial pressure, the level of glomerular filtration achieved in rats of this group (545 +/- 55 microl/min per g kidney weight) was similar to that found in losartan-treated rats. No effect of either treatment on renal plasma flow was detected; as a consequence, the excessive decrease in filtration fraction observed for rats in the enalapril-treated group was corrected by concomitant administration of Hoe 140. Interestingly, administration of enalapril resulted in a greater loss of sodium than did administration of losartan (723 +/- 147 versus 308 +/- 57 micromol during 6 days), and this effect was abolished by infusion of Hoe 140 (353 +/- 42 micromol during 6 days). CONCLUSION: Administration of enalapril to sodium-depleted rats with one-kidney, one clip hypertension reduces their glomerular filtration rate to a greater extent than does administration of losartan despite these agents having similar effects on systemic blood pressure. Combined administration of enalapril and Hoe 140 has a less marked effect on glomerular filtration rate than does that of enalapril alone. This suggests that kinins play a role in the regulation of efferent arteriolar tone in this rat model.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Demeilliers et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c10801567d2fc4d5f8847https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199816070-00017
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper