PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2025Applied Geography19 citationsOpen Access

Spatialities of remote work across the EU regions in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic: Regional change, factors, interlinkages

NKNikos Kapitsinis

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

One of the most important implications of Covid-19 pertains to increasing trends of remote work, due to lockdown measures, mainly in knowledge-intensive sectors, that have changed work-life balance. These changes unfold unevenly among countries and regions, since, for instance, urban areas have a larger share of jobs that could be performed remotely. This paper studies how and why remote work unfolds unevenly across space in the context of Covid-19, thus enriching our understanding of shifting spatial organization of work after the pandemic arose. Particularly, using secondary figures from Eurostat and adopts fixed-effects and spatial error regression analysis in 217 EU NUTS2 regions with remote work rate in 2020 and the annual change between 2019 and 2020 as dependent variables. The paper then in-depth discusses and integrates the results into the regional socio-economic environment through two regions case-studies to better contextualize the findings. The results highlight the geographically uneven changes in the organization of work and the regional variation in remote working across the EU in the context of Covid-19. The regional industrial structure, policies to contain Covid-19, regional structural elements and demographics proved to be key factors of the spatialities of remote work. • Covid-19 triggered an enormous increase of remote working in the EU regions. • The changes in the organization of work geographically uneven. • The regional variation in remote working across the EU was clustered. • Covid-19 mitigation policies and regional industrial structure were key factors. • Regional structural elements and demographics were also important.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nikos Kapitsinis (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c239f69a4af5b15a9649dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103531
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Home‐based Telework, Gender, and the Synchronization of Work and Family: Perspectives of Teleworkers and their Co‐residents2001 · 475 citations
  2. 2Occupation and COVID-19 mortality in England: a national linked data study of 14.3 million adults2021 · 119 citations
  3. 3Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons1983 · 649 citations
  4. 4The annihilation of time by space in the COVID-19 pandemic downturn2020 · 14 citations
  5. 5The impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on employment and firm revenues in Hungary2021 · 12 citations