PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Food and Bioprocess Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of Diffuse Reflectance and Transflectance Imaging for Detecting Cane Sugar Adulteration in Clear Apple Juice

HMHoa Xuan MacNHNga Thi Thanh HaLFLászló Friedrich

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract This study proposes a new method to identify adulteration of transparent liquid food by optical method. Cane sugar adulteration (0–10% w/w) was performed in commercial 100% clear apple juice. Samples were illuminated by six laser beams (532, 635, 780, 808, 850, and 1064 nm) using laser-induced diffuse reflectance imaging (LIDRI) and laser-induced diffuse transflectance imaging (LIDTI). A systematic comparison between the two configurations was conducted to evaluate their relative performance. Backscattering features were extracted using unimodal (for LIDRI) and bimodal (for LIDTI) Gaussian curve-fitting. The Kruskal–Wallis test showed that the extracted features significantly responded to sugar addition ( p < 0.05). The LIDTI features exhibited greater sensitivity to adulteration than those of LIDRI. Random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms were applied for classification and regression. LIDTI outperformed LIDRI in both tasks. The best performance was achieved using RF for classification (cross-validation accuracy of 98.9% and prediction accuracy of 100%) and kNN for regression ( R 2 CV = 0.933 and R 2 P = 0.937). These results demonstrate that LIDTI is a promising approach for rapid and non-destructive detection of sugar adulteration in clear apple juice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mac et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c45ae1567d2fc4d5fdbb5https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-026-04426-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper