PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 2026ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)0 citationsOpen Access

BEAT-SSL: Capturing Local ECG Morphology Through Heartbeat-Level Contrastive Learning with Soft Targets

View Full Paper
MRMuhammad Ilham RizqyawanPMPeter MacfarlaneSHStathis Hadjidemetriou

Key Result

Beat-SSL reached 93% of an ECG foundation model's performance in multilabel classification and surpassed all other methods in the segmentation task by 4%, despite using only 2.5% of the pretraining data.

Structured PICO

P
Population
ECG data
I
Intervention
Beat-SSL (contrastive learning framework performing dual-context learning through rhythm-level and heartbeat-level contrasting with soft targets)
C
Comparator
Three other methods, including one ECG foundation model
O
Outcome
Performance on multilabel classification for global rhythm assessment and ECG segmentation

Beat-SSL provides an efficient contrastive learning framework for ECG analysis that achieves high performance with significantly less pretraining data.

Abstract

Obtaining labelled ECG data for developing supervised models is challenging. Contrastive learning (CL) has emerged as a promising pretraining approach that enables effective transfer learning with limited labelled data. However, existing CL frameworks either focus solely on global context or fail to exploit ECG-specific characteristics. Furthermore, these methods rely on hard contrastive targets, which may not adequately capture the continuous nature of feature similarity in ECG signals. In this paper, we propose Beat-SSL, a contrastive learning framework that performs dual-context learning through both rhythm-level and heartbeat-level contrasting with soft targets. We evaluated our pretrained model on two downstream tasks: 1) multilabel classification for global rhythm assessment, and 2) ECG segmentation to assess its capacity to learn representations across both contexts. We conducted an ablation study and compared the best configuration with three other methods, including one ECG foundation model. Despite using 2.5% of the foundation model data on pretraining, Beat-SSL reached 93% of its performance in multilabel classification task and surpassed all other methods in the segmentation task by 4%.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rizqyawan et al. (2026) studied ECG analysis. Beat-SSL (contrastive learning framework) vs. Three other methods, including one ECG foundation model was evaluated on Multilabel classification for global rhythm assessment and ECG segmentation. Beat-SSL reached 93% of an ECG foundation model's performance in multilabel classification and surpassed all other methods in the segmentation task by 4%, despite using only 2.5% of the pretraining data.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c47255b8f4ede65a9bf06https://doi.org/10.1109/isbi61048.2026.11515777
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper