PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1995Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology163 citations

Prenatal detection of heart defects at the routine fetal examination at 18 weeks in a non‐selected population

View Full Paper
ETEva TegnanderSES. H. Eik‐NesOJO. J. Johansen

Structured PICO

Does incorporating the four-chamber view at the 18-week routine ultrasound examination improve the prenatal detection rate of congenital heart defects in a non-selected population?

P
Population
11,894 fetuses in a non-selected population undergoing routine fetal examination at 18 weeks of gestation (4,435 in Phase I and 7,459 in Phase II).
I
Intervention
Routine ultrasound examination incorporating the four-chamber view (Phase II).
C
Comparator
Routine ultrasound examination without special attention to the heart (Phase I).
O
Outcome
Prenatal detection rate of congenital heart defects.surrogate

Incorporating the four-chamber view during routine 18-week fetal ultrasound modestly improves the prenatal detection rate of critical congenital heart defects.

Abstract

Few studies have addressed the prenatal detection rate of congenital heart defects in a non-selected population at 18 weeks of gestation. Our objective was to assess the change in the prenatal detection rate of congenital heart defects in such a population that resulted from incorporating the four-chamber view at the second-trimester routine ultrasound examination. The prenatal detection rate of heart defects was prospectively compared between 4435 fetuses in Phase I who were scanned without special attention to the heart, and 7459 fetuses in Phase II who were scanned incorporating the four-chamber view. Of the 49 heart defects in Phase 1, 17 (35%) were critical and three (18%) of these were detected prenatally. Of the 90 heart defects in Phase II, 23 (26%) were critical, six (26%) of these were detected prenatally at the 18 weeks' routine scan, and three were detected in the third trimester, providing a total prenatal detection rate of 39%. A defect was classified as critical when a surgical repair was likely to be required because of gross structural complexity having a functional significance, e.g. transposition of the great arteries, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, atrioventricular septal defect, coarctation of the aorta, and large ventricular septal defect. No non-critical heart defects were detected prenatally in either of the phases. The incidences in the total population were 11 and 12/1000 in Phases I and II, respectively. Thirty-two per cent of the critical and 16% of the non-critical defects had associated abnormalities and/or abnormal karyotype.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tegnander et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c4834923c8e1e6e9cd604https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05060372.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Detection of fetal congenital heart disease in a low-risk population1998 · 61 citations
  2. 2Detection of congenital heart defects throughout pregnancy; impact of first trimester ultrasound screening for cardiac abnormalities2012 · 36 citations
  3. 3Second trimester cardiac diagnosis: screening standards and outcomes2014 · 7 citations
  4. 4Detection Rate of Early Fetal Echocardiography and In Utero Development of Congenital Heart Defects2006 · 77 citations
  5. 5Simplified first‐trimester fetal cardiac screening (four chamber view and ventricular outflow tracts) in a low‐risk population2014 · 28 citations