Using Large Language Models to Detect and Debunk Climate Change Misinformation

The rapid spread of climate change misinformation across digital platforms undermines scientific literacy, public trust, and evidence-based policy action. Advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Large Language Models (LLMs) create new opportunities for automating the detection and correction of misleading climate-related narratives. This study presents a multi-stage system that employs state-of-the-art large language models such as Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4), Large Language Model Meta AI (LLaMA) version 3 (LLaMA-3), and RoBERTa-large (Robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach large) to identify, classify, and generate scientifically grounded corrections for climate misinformation. The system integrates several complementary techniques, including transformer-based text classification, semantic similarity scoring using Sentence-BERT, stance detection, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for evidence-grounded debunking. Misinformation instances are detected through a fine-tuned RoBERTa–Multi-Genre Natural Language Inference (MNLI) classifier (RoBERTa-MNLI), grouped using BERTopic, and verified against curated climate-science knowledge sources using BM25 and dense retrieval via FAISS (Facebook AI Similarity Search). The debunking component employs RAG-enhanced GPT-4 to produce accurate and persuasive counter-messages aligned with authoritative scientific reports such as those from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). A diverse dataset of climate misinformation categories covering denialism, cherry-picking of data, false causation narratives, and misleading comparisons is compiled for evaluation. Benchmarking experiments demonstrate that LLM-based models substantially outperform traditional machine-learning baselines such as Support Vector Machines, Logistic Regression, and Random Forests in precision, contextual understanding, and robustness to linguistic variation. Expert assessment further shows that generated debunking messages exhibit higher clarity, scientific accuracy, and persuasive effectiveness compared to conventional fact-checking text. These results highlight the potential of advanced LLM-driven pipelines to provide scalable, real-time mitigation of climate misinformation while offering guidelines for responsible deployment of AI-assisted debunking systems.