PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 18, 2013Magnetic Resonance in Medicine68 citationsOpen Access

Aortic relative pressure components derived from four‐dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance

View Full Paper
Pablo Lamata
Pablo LamataCross-Cutting Cardiology
APAlex PitcherJohn Radcliffe HospitalSKSebastian KrittianUniversity of Oxford

Key Result

4D-flow CMR-derived relative aortic pressure in healthy subjects is primarily driven by transient effects (64.5 mmHg/m), followed by convective (13.6 mmHg/m) and viscous (0.3 mmHg/m) contributions.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=12)

Structured PICO

P
Population
9 healthy volunteers and 3 patients with aortic disease (bicuspid aortic valve, dissection, and Marfan syndrome)
I
Intervention
4D-flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to compute spatiotemporal pressure maps
O
Outcome
Spatiotemporal distribution of relative aortic pressure and magnitude of its three major components (transient, convective, and viscous)surrogate

4D-flow CMR enables the quantification of the three components of relative aortic pressure, offering mechanistic insights for understanding and stratifying aortic disease.

Abstract

Purpose To describe the assessment of the spatiotemporal distribution of relative aortic pressure quantifying the magnitude of its three major components. Methods Nine healthy volunteers and three patients with aortic disease (bicuspid aortic valve, dissection, and Marfan syndrome) underwent 4D-flow CMR. Spatiotemporal pressure maps were computed from the CMR flow fields solving the pressure Poisson equation. The individual components of pressure were separated into time-varying inertial (“transient”), spatially varying inertial (“convective”), and viscous components. Results Relative aortic pressure is primarily caused by transient effects followed by the convective and small viscous contributions (64.5, 13.6, and 0.3 mmHg/m, respectively, in healthy subjects), although regional analysis revealed prevalent convective effects in specific contexts, e.g., Sinus of Valsalva and aortic arch at instants of peak velocity. Patients showed differences in peak transient values and duration, and localized abrupt convective changes explained by abnormalities in aortic geometry, including the presence of an aneurysm, a pseudo-coarctation, the inlet of a dissection, or by complex flow patterns. Conclusion The evaluation of the three components of relative pressure enables the quantification of mechanistic information for understanding and stratifying aortic disease, with potential future implications for guiding therapy. Magn Reson Med 72:1162–1169, 2014. © 2013 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lamata et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Aortic disease (n=12). 4D-flow CMR was evaluated on Spatiotemporal distribution of relative aortic pressure and its three major components. 4D-flow CMR-derived relative aortic pressure in healthy subjects is primarily driven by transient effects (64.5 mmHg/m), followed by convective (13.6 mmHg/m) and viscous (0.3 mmHg/m) contributions.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c8e0f66d062ff2dc3f452https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper