PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1995265 citations

Self-similarity through high-variability

View Full Paper
WWWalter WillingerMTMurad S. TaqquRSRobert P. Sherman

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A number of recent empirical studies of traffic measurements from a variety of working packet networks have convincingly demonstrated that actual network traffic is self-similar or long-range dependent in nature (i.e., bursty over a wide range of time scales) - in sharp contrast to commonly made traffic modeling assumptions. In this paper, we provide a plausible physical explanation for the occurrence of self-similarity in high-speed network traffic. Our explanation is based on convergence results for processes that exhibit high variability (i.e., infinite variance) and is supported by detailed statistical analyses of real-time traffic measurements from Ethernet LAN's at the level of individual sources.Our key mathematical result states that the superposition of many ON/OFF sources (also known as packet trains) whose ON-periods and OFF-periods exhibit the Noah Effect (i.e., have high variability or infinite variance) produces aggregate network traffic that features the Joseph Effect (i.e., is self-similar or long-range dependent). There is, moreover, a simple relation between the parameters describing the intensities of the Noah Effect (high variability) and the Joseph Effect (self-similarity). An extensive statistical analysis of two sets of high time-resolution traffic measurements from two Ethernet LAN's (involving a few hundred active source-destination pairs) confirms that the data at the level of individual sources or source-destination pairs are consistent with the Noah Effect. We also discuss implications of this simple physical explanation for the presence of self-similar traffic patterns in modern high-speed network traffic for (i) parsimonious traffic modeling (ii) efficient synthetic generation of realistic traffic patterns, and (iii) relevant network performance and protocol analysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Willinger et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ca5a55a7763abe7898daehttps://doi.org/10.1145/217382.217418
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1G.Samorodnitsky,M.S.Taqqu:Stable non-Gaussian Random Processes--Stochastic Models with Infinite Variance1996 · 559 citations
  2. 2A Simple General Approach to Inference About the Tail of a Distribution1975 · 3,160 citations
  3. 3Self-Similar Error Clusters in Communication Systems and the Concept of Conditional Stationarity1965 · 184 citations
  4. 4The Fractal Geometry of Nature1983 · 21,998 citations
  5. 5UNIX process behavior and load balancing among loosely-coupled computers1986 · 8 citations