PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2020Sarcoma30 citationsOpen Access

PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma

APAmanda ParkesEUElizabeth UrquiolaPBPriya Bhosale

Structured PICO

Does PET/CT imaging distinguish well-differentiated from dedifferentiated liposarcoma in patients with recurrent liposarcoma?

P
Population
20 patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) or dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) with 26 PET/CTs performed for separate recurrences followed by surgical sampling
I
Intervention
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging with maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measurement
C
Comparator
Histological confirmation by independent pathologist review
O
Outcome
Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of SUVmax in identifying DDLPS versus WDLPSsurrogate

PET/CT imaging using a SUVmax cutoff of 4 provides high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing dedifferentiated from well-differentiated liposarcoma.

Abstract

Distinguishing well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) from dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is essential given distinct treatment paradigms and chemosensitivity. Percutaneous biopsy has a low sensitivity for detecting DDLPS. We sought to identify the diagnostic utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in identifying WDLPS versus DDLPS. An independent radiologist reviewed PET/CT images to identify target lesions and determine the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). An independent pathologist review confirmed WDLPS or DDLPS histology. A binary cutoff point of SUVmax was identified using a classification and regression trees (CART) algorithm. We identified 20 patients with WDLPS or DDLPS with 26 PET/CTs performed for separate recurrences that were followed by surgical sampling. Of the 26 records, 12 were DDLPS (46%) and 14 were WDLPS (54%). Patients with DDLPS had significantly higher SUVmax than those with WDLPS (pvalue = 0.0035). A SUVmax of 4 was identified as the cutoff point. Using this cutoff, the sensitivity of SUVmax identifying a case as DDLPS was 83.3% (95% CI: 51.6%, 97.9%) and the specificity was 85.7% (95% CI: 57.2%, 98.2%). PET/CT is a sensitive and specific diagnostic tool to identify the presence of dedifferentiation within the tumor.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Parkes et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ce66fdf63e2f8047565b5https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8363986
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper