PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1994Molecular and Cellular Biology164 citationsOpen Access

Cell-Specific Expression of the Macrophage Scavenger Receptor Gene Is Dependent on PU.l and a Composite AP-l/ets Motif

View Full Paper
KMKaren S. MoultonKSK SempleHWHong Wu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The type I and II scavenger receptors (SRs) are highly restricted to cells of monocyte origin and become maximally expressed during the process of monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation. In this report, we present evidence that SR genomic sequences from -245 to +46 bp relative to the major transcriptional start site were sufficient to confer preferential expression of a reporter gene to cells of monocyte and macrophage origin. This profile of expression resulted from the combinatorial actions of multiple positive and negative regulatory elements. Positive transcriptional control was primarily determined by two elements, located 181 and 46 bp upstream of the major transcriptional start site. Transcriptional control via the -181 element was mediated by PU.1/Spi-1, a macrophage and B-cell-specific transcription factor that is a member of the ets domain gene family. Intriguingly, the -181 element represented a relatively low-affinity binding site for Spi-B, a closely related member of the ets domain family that has been shown to bind with relatively high affinity to other PU.1/Spi-1 binding sites. These observations support the idea that PU.1/Spi-1 and Spi-B regulate overlapping but nonidentical sets of genes. The -46 element represented a composite binding site for a distinct set of ets domain proteins that were preferentially expressed in monocyte and macrophage cell lines and that formed ternary complexes with members of the AP-1 gene family. In concert, these observations suggest a model for how interactions between cell-specific and more generally expressed transcription factors function to dictate the appropriate temporal and cell-specific patterns of SR expression during the process of macrophage differentiation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moulton et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1cef55566b67b7d58617eahttps://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.14.7.4408-4418.1994
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The human homologue of the putative proto-oncogene Spi-1: characterization and expression in tumors.1990 · 64 citations
  2. 2Regulation of mononuclear phagocyte proliferation by colony-stimulating factor-11990 · 24 citations
  3. 3Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis1981 · 2,856 citations
  4. 4Binding site on macrophages that mediates uptake and degradation of acetylated low density lipoprotein, producing massive cholesterol deposition1979 · 2,461 citations
  5. 5High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA.1987 · 5,335 citations